cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

R6 Chromatic Aberration, Diffraction, not sure?

OnShotImages
Contributor

I was noticing on a recent sports event that my R6 paired with my EF 24-105 f/4 (vello adapter) showed significant chromatic abberation (I think) -- see attached image.  The R6 settings for abberration are ON.  I've not seen this before.  Anyone experience this ?

 

Screen Shot 2022-05-11 at 3.26.16 PM.png

28 REPLIES 28

kvbarkley
VIP
VIP

Does the camera know it has an EF lens? Is the Vello adapter masking the lens type?

R6 reads the lens model correctly in the menu settings

Tronhard
VIP
VIP

What were your settings for taking this shot, esp. shutter speed? 

Have you repeated this by shooting other objects that are not moving?


cheers, TREVOR

The mark of good photographer is less what they hold in their hand, it's more what they hold in their head;
"All the variety, all the charm, all the beauty of life is made up of light and shadow", Leo Tolstoy;
"Skill in photography is acquired by practice and not by purchase" Percy W. Harris

1/1600 s f/4, ISO 160, Focal length 60mm

I've seen on a few other pics but I shot ~ 7000 that day and most are ok. 

The image I attached is a screen shot.  I'll attach a jpeg

 

If it was simple diffraction, I would expect to see the halo effect around the person, or at least on the brightest areas, but I am intrigued that is found only on the cyclist's trailing edge...


cheers, TREVOR

The mark of good photographer is less what they hold in their hand, it's more what they hold in their head;
"All the variety, all the charm, all the beauty of life is made up of light and shadow", Leo Tolstoy;
"Skill in photography is acquired by practice and not by purchase" Percy W. Harris

jrhoffman75
Legend
Legend

It seems t be limited to the very “white” (maybe blown out) regions of your subject. Could be a result of your software?

CA is generally all around.

Can you post a link to file out of camera? Preferably RAW.

John Hoffman
Conway, NH

1D X Mark III, M200, Many lenses, Pixma PRO-100, Pixma TR8620a, Lr Classic

Waddizzle
Legend
Legend

The posted image is only 998 x 691 in size.  This could explain part of the issue.  Did you capture the original as RAW and apply any lens correction?

--------------------------------------------------------
"Fooling computers since 1972."

OnShotImages
Contributor

IM 2022-3838.jpg


@OnShotImages wrote:

IM 2022-3838.jpg


This image looks pretty good at actual size.  Are you using any lens filters?

--------------------------------------------------------
"Fooling computers since 1972."
Announcements