04-04-2014 10:07 AM
Has anyone done some testing to determine if there is any gain in using the ProRes 422 HQ codec for transcoding the 1DC 4K C-Log footage (over the ProRes 422)?
04-08-2014 05:30 PM - edited 04-08-2014 05:32 PM
I have done some minimal testing. Most of the time I cannot tell a difference for the short conceptual / music video type web output work I am doing.
My expereince is that if I have a shoot where I had literally no light and tons of noise- eg a single lamp at night at 28k+ ISO and the image is falling apart- then when I go to HQ at high res- then compress to 720p or 1080p, the noise and grain appear a bit better than the lower quality codecs.
For nearly everything else I cannot tell a difference for my own purposes- but if theatrical / big screen projection are your goals as a final desitnation- it may very well be a different story and workflow. So please reach out to others who are working for that level.
Phillip Bloom has a nice post about how he handled some of this (before Premiere was better handling the 1DC) here-
go most of the way down when you read his post- it is a terrific and helpful about how he did the video as well as some basic workflow-
(in the question section #20 from me is where I ask a newbie question about output - haha)
hope this helps!
http://philipbloom.net/2013/03/11/bittenbythefrost/
12-08-2014 10:23 PM
If you want to import them into some edit software like FCP. then I suggest you ProRes 422. This will much faster to render and convert in your fcp.
12/18/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS C300 Mark III - Version 1..0.9.1
EOS C500 Mark II - Version 1.1.3.1
12/05/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.2
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.