Post-season soccer provided an opportunity to test the 200-400 and 1DX III in some high ISO situations during a night game. I expected this to primarily be a day baseball/softball/soccer lens but with the 1DX III an f4 / f5.6 lens works well at nigh...
After a spectacular flipping slide into home, celebrate by sharing a little dust from the baseball diamond with your teammate.Shot with Canon 1DX Mark III and EF 70-200 IS III @ f2.8, 1/1250, ISO 160.Rodger
Our soccer keep lived up to the motto on his senior poster for senior night, "My goal is to stop yours".Shot with Canon 1DX Mark III with EF 400 f2.8 @ 1/1000, f2.8, ISO 2000.Rodger
Indoor is tough for any camera/lens combination when the lighting is poor. And I think volleyball is the hardest sport to shoot, at least it is for me.The T5 sensor is pretty old technology so it doesn't have anywhere close to the noise performance ...
For AF, you generally want a single point for most sports or single point with expansion to 4 corners. YOU have to put the focus point on what you want; facial recognition won't cut it for sports until AI advances to the point that it knows which pl...
Each currently installed CPU has 8 cores, it is a HP Z840 designed for intensive graphics and modeling work and is well suited for the files produced by a lot of current cameras.DPP works fine for me with this setup, it is noticeably slower on my Z s...
With some cameras, and the R5 is one as is the 1DX III, the files result in much higher DPP workload. I use a HP twin CPU workstation with twin Nvidia workstation graphics cards and I don't experience those time lags with DPP but I do if I try to use...
For low light sports, both the lens and body upgrade would be beneficial and I would go lens first. If you are in a location where the 70-200 f2.8 has enough reach, go for it first. I use three camera bodies for football (1DX III) and the 70-200 f2...
