05-02-2020 01:37 PM
Being cooped in the house has made me creative when it comes to taking photos. What are you doing?
There are some bushes and small trees just outside the window to my home office. I have turned the window into a bird blind. One problem is my 2FL window is a little hazy, which is not really much of an issue. The bigger issue are the curtains reflecting off of the inside of the window, which creates a hazy type of look. The LR Dehaze Tool cleans it up, but also reduces the sharpness.
That was shot on the first day, which was heavily overcast, and rainy. It has been that way for weeks now. I think I shot this one with the 1D Mark IV and the Sigma 150-600mm "C". This is not a crop! They are about 12-20 feet away.
05-07-2020 06:44 PM
B&H had the 35mm Art as the daily special for under $600. It is still on sale, but not for the one day sale price. The addition of the Sigma 35mm changes things a little bit. Or, maybe it makes sorting things out a little easier.
Last week, I had bought a used 1Ds Mark III in mint condition because I wanted a spare battery, spare charger, and an AC adapter. Plus, my intent was to use it continue archiving old photos, instead of using the 1D Mark IV. I am very high risk, so I have not been outdoors to shoot with the 1Ds Mark III, but some photos I have taken on my daily walks, when it is not raining, look pretty good.
This frees up the 1D Mark IV for sports and wildlife photography again. I am still torn between it and the 7D Mark II as a second body for sports and wildlife. For now, resolving that issue is pretty moot in the NYC tri-state area.
However, the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art just might settle the issue. It is going to live on one of those two bodies for now, most likely the 1D Mark IV. The 7D Mark II has the much quieter shutter, which I like for wildlife.
For reasons that cannot explain, I seem to have developed a knack for finding and photographing the little critters and smaller birds. I'm blaming the fact that I like to fish, but now I find photography to be much cleaner.. I think the Sigma 35mm will find a good home with the 1D Mark IV, and a couple other fast primes, 50mm and 85mm, and I want to add the EF 135mm f/2L.
-------------------------------------
I am still evaluating the 1Ds Mark III for quirks and flaws. So far, so good. The camera works as it should, it is mint condition clean. All of the camera accessories are still in the original wrappings. It seems someone only used the camera with another 1D body. The battery was inside of the camera, but everything was in what looked like original factory plastic bags.
The USB port works, card slots work, and the flash shoe works as it should. The only quirk that I found so far is that the focusing screen is not the default CIV screen. It is the D screen, instead, which I do not mind. Seeing how I planned to use it to mainly sample photos, that screen will be more useful because of its' gridlines.
The 1Ds Mark III is not quite a work-alike clone of the 1D Mark IV that I had expected, so I am still getting used to that. Otherwise, the colors and images are just as good as the 1D Mark IV, and probably a bit better when it comes to casual stills.
05-07-2020 08:16 PM
Home isolation has caused me to do less photography and a lot more home work. This afternoon I spent three hours with my Deere utility tractor's mid mount mower deck changing the belt and doing other basic maintenance (cleaned and replaced a zerk fitting on the deck PTO shaft and changed the deck gear box oil). I definitely prefer carrying heavy primes during a soccer gang to fighting with a very strong belt tension spring!
Photography wise neither pets nor my daughter are safe from being subjects while sports are on hold 🙂
Rodger
05-08-2020 10:40 PM
05-30-2020 03:34 PM - edited 05-30-2020 03:37 PM
06-02-2020 07:45 AM
Well, I've been out walking in the golden hour of dawn.
Not much activity these days in the parks.
It is like people are playing hide and go seek.
EOS 6D and EF 35mm f/2 IS USM - I/1250, f/4, ISO 250 and lots of LR.
These are replicas of the Nina and the Pinta used by Christopher Columbus from two years ago.
The hulls of the ships were heavily oiled, and had a deep black color,.
Hard to believe that ships like these crossed the Atlantic, no wonder they had three of them.
Sadly, both of these ships were destroyed a couple of months later in a dock fire.
06-02-2020 02:08 PM
Such a pity. They look like well-constructed replicas. I guess being heavily oiled they would have gone up like torches. Sad though that is, they would have made amazing photos in their last moments.
06-14-2020 10:20 PM
I've been busy with the improvised bird blind. Small birds are jittery critters and easily spooked, but they are not very smart. I set up a scarecrow on my 2FL deck, not to scare the birds away. I wanted them to get used to seeing a human.
I can sit on the deck and practically take all the photos I want of birds 20-50 feet away. This is great range for the 7D2 and the Sigma 150-600mm "C".
My FB friends tell me this one is called a Northern Flicker. Basically, it's a woodpecker that digs into dirt to eat worms.
These are juveniles being fed by adults. They're only about 25 feet away, if that far.
06-14-2020 11:51 PM
Well, I'm definitely not a bird photographer, but I had occasion yesterday afternoon to wish I were. A hawk I hadn't seen before came by and flew around over our house, apparently interested in a nearby colony of crows. Two or three crows came out to intercept and harass him, and the skirmish went on for several minutes before the hawk gave up and moved on. They weren't very high above the house, so you guys with the 150-600's would probably have had a pretty successful shoot.
06-15-2020 06:46 AM
Bob,
I am not a bird photographer, either. If I were, I would rather be photographing hawks, eagles, and egrets. But, I have trouble finding them. And, the hikes to many of the larger predatory birds are commonly found are just too much for me now. So, I go with what presents itself.
I bought the 150-600 because I am near lots of water bodies, both big and small. Photographing wildlife reminds me a WHOLE LOT of fishing. I have always loved fishing, but photography is much cleaner. Much more expensive, so much more cleaner and neater.
My three easy access locations to photograph egrets have either been closed. One was pond that it undergoing a year long dredging operation. The others were in parks that have closed to the public for past 3-4 months. No further comment needed about that.
These shots are backyard type of stuff. I really liked the one of the juveniles being fed by the adult on the right. I have been learning their habits. They do not seem to mind a human sitting 20-50 feet away from them, anymore. All I need to really do is keep my face hidden, and keep eye contact to a minimum.
06-23-2020 11:23 PM
I've been shooting just about everything that's in my yard, both flora and fauna With the exception of the tiny 1/8" purple flower, Baldwins Eryngo (purple form), which was taken using the 5D4 and 100mm f/2.8 L IS USM Macro (hand held), they were taken with a 5D mark IV and EF 100-400mm 4.5-5.6L IS USM II. Hopefully, the EXIF info remains intact for those interested. I have a weird style All of the imgaes have been cropped and reduced to save space.
Enjoy,
-FD
12/18/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS C300 Mark III - Version 1..0.9.1
EOS C500 Mark II - Version 1.1.3.1
12/05/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.2
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.