@shadowsports wrote:But getting back on topic.
2. I think Wadizzle is right about this. (IBIS) I can't find anything conclusive,but reviewing your manual with a fine tooth comb might help. Canon has a tendency to document this stuff, if you look closely. This also goes back to @shawphoto's post regarding using the "Canon System" or like hardware. Its true Canon sells a system that when used together is unlikely to be surpassed from a compatibility, reliablity and consistent results standpoint.
This image is from the Canon USA online store.
"The 5-axis in-body image stabilization can effectively compensate for camera shake with approximately 8 stops of stabilization* with use of certain non-stabilized, and optically image stabilized lenses"
It is not clearly defined which "certain" lenses they are talking about. What is clear is that it does not work with all lenses. Judging from the complaints from users about the IBIS menu option not appearing with some lenses, all of which use the EF/RF adapter, leads me to my conclusion.
That, and a Rudy Winston's video clip that I can no longer find, going back to when the camera was first released. He had pointed that IBIS enters a degraded mode with EF lenses using the adapter. Maybe that has been corrected with a firmware update, or maybe it has not. It would not surprise me to learn that IBIS is unavailable to 3rd party EF mount lenses.
@johninbigd wrote:
@Canonoli wrote:What about it?
From someone coming from a pro body the 1Dx Mark II, I think that the R5 is a great camera.
If you want to see the images with better skin tones than I suggest you look into purchasing the profile I suggested above.
But go ahead and try as many trial programs as you can, or you can create your own profiles if your good enought to understand the process. 🙂
And you can always use the software that Canon supplies, if you don't like the results of other software.
As I mentioned, I did try the colorfidelity profiles and they weren't very good. The neutral and fine detail profiles were okay, but the other three had obvious problems and were not usable. That is why I'm trying DxO Photolab, since it already supports the R5 and R6 and, so far, has clearly better skin tones. However, I think I'll give the colorfidelity profiles another shot because Photolab is not really good for portraits. It would be fantastic for landscape photographers, though, which seems to be what they've designed their product for. I shoot almost entirely portraits, so I need good skin tones.
You can build your own color profiles with an X-Rite ColorChecker. It's automated. Just take a photo of the color chart. It's just like doing AFMA on a lens. Now, you're calibrating your image sensor against a standard color chart.
All of my cameras have nearly identical colors at ISO 100. As ISO increases you can begin to see very small diffrences, but most of the differences are noise, not color saturation or contrast.
can select a camera profile. Instead of "Adobe Standard" or some other Adobe profile, I see the name of my camera and select that. In fact, it gets automaticlly selected when the RAW files are imported.
