03-23-2020 06:18 PM
Hopefully this won't get deleted, but Tech Radar interviewed David Parry of Canon (a product marketing specialist) and asked several questions about the R5. Some interesting stuff. I look forward to the camera's release. The last time I posted some info about the R5, in which a Canon source confirmed specs, our crackerjack mods deleted it almost immediately.
03-23-2020 08:28 PM
@John_SD wrote:Hopefully this won't get deleted, but Tech Radar interviewed David Parry of Canon (a product marketing specialist) and asked several questions about the R5. Some interesting stuff. I look forward to the camera's release. The last time I posted some info about the R5, in which a Canon source confirmed specs, our crackerjack mods deleted it almost immediately.
Did the beans being spilled include why they're calling it the R5 instead of the R2? Canon's numbering system has always been more than a little confusing, and this strikes me as a missed opportunity to rationalize it a bit.
03-23-2020 08:49 PM
@RobertTheFat wrote:
@John_SD wrote:Hopefully this won't get deleted, but Tech Radar interviewed David Parry of Canon (a product marketing specialist) and asked several questions about the R5. Some interesting stuff. I look forward to the camera's release. The last time I posted some info about the R5, in which a Canon source confirmed specs, our crackerjack mods deleted it almost immediately.
Did the beans being spilled include why they're calling it the R5 instead of the R2? Canon's numbering system has always been more than a little confusing, and this strikes me as a missed opportunity to rationalize it a bit.
Yes, he explained it.
"So is that why this camera is called the EOS R5?
"It's aimed at that level of the market. This isn't a replacement for the 5D Mark IV or anything like that. But this is a mirrorless 5-series, it's aimed at that segment of the market," he said.
"Which makes sense because in film days we had the EOS 5, then with digital DSLRs we had the 5D, and now we've got the R5 now. So it's all the same sort of level." he added.
03-24-2020 10:35 AM
This article showed up on my recommended reading list yesterday.
Body looks ok, but I am weary of my need for 45MP and 8K. But hey, if Canon can squeeze all that in on its new Digic, and it has decent battery life and doesn't overheat it might be a good body. I'd be fine with 34MP and 4K
I am still hoping for a 5D5 as most know. I have a bad feeling about our trip to Alaska this year but we'll see.
~Rick
Bay Area - CA
~R5 C (1.0.9.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve Studio ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 8 ~CarePaks Are Worth It
03-24-2020 10:47 AM
@shadowsports wrote:This article showed up on my recommended reading list yesterday.
Body looks ok, but I am weary of my need for 45MP and 8K. But hey, if Canon can squeeze all that in on its new Digic, and it has decent battery life and doesn't overheat it might be a good body. I'd be fine with 34MP and 4K
I am still hoping for a 5D5 as most know. I have a bad feeling about our trip to Alaska this year but we'll see.
I'm OK with 45 MP, but couldn't care less about 8K, but everything is hybrid now.
I am assuming that one or both slots will be CFexpress?
03-24-2020 11:10 AM
"...our crackerjack mods deleted it almost immediately."
And they delete arbitrarily and with out reason. Could at least tell us why?
03-24-2020 11:15 AM
"I am still hoping for a 5D5 as most know."
I think "hoping" isn't enough. The day of the shutter is done.
03-24-2020 11:22 AM - edited 03-24-2020 11:27 AM
@ebiggs1 wrote:"...our crackerjack mods deleted it almost immediately."
And they delete arbitrarily and with out reason. Could at least tell us why?
I asked the same question weeks ago, and in fact posted a topic that was explicitly addressed to the mods in the Subject line.
It never received a reply and appears to have been deleted itself.
EDIT: Actually, it did receive replies from scammers. But no mod replied to my query.
03-24-2020 02:43 PM
@John_SD wrote:
@ebiggs1 wrote:"...our crackerjack mods deleted it almost immediately."
And they delete arbitrarily and with out reason. Could at least tell us why?
I asked the same question weeks ago, and in fact posted a topic that was explicitly addressed to the mods in the Subject line.
It never received a reply and appears to have been deleted itself.
EDIT: Actually, it did receive replies from scammers. But no mod replied to my query.
Censorship is a sore subject, at least in the U.S. Those who do the censoring are seldom willing to engage in debates about their decisions or to explain the process that led to those decisions.
03-24-2020 02:46 PM
@ebiggs1 wrote:"I am still hoping for a 5D5 as most know."
I think "hoping" isn't enough. The day of the shutter is done.
The day of the mirror is (almost) done. I think the shutter still has some time left.
02/20/2025: New firmware updates are available.
RF70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Z - Version 1.0.6
RF24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z - Version 1.0.9
RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.8
RF50mm F1.4 L VCM - Version 1.0.2
RF24mm F1.4 L VCM - Version 1.0.3
01/27/2025: New firmware updates are available.
12/18/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS C300 Mark III - Version 1..0.9.1
EOS C500 Mark II - Version 1.1.3.1
12/05/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.2
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.