End of the Line for M Series, Finally?

[Tronhard]

Canon Japan formally discontinues the last EOS-M cameras, saying goodbye to EF-M: Digital Photograph...

If so, is Canon finally starting to reduce its legacy platforms? They are taking their lead from an article from Canon Rumors: Canon EOS-M has been quietly discontinued (canonrumors.com)  In does seem that the M-series has disappeared from the USA catalogue and my local NZ catalogue listing. 

[Waddizzle]

Wow, is Canon really discontinuing the M series without replacing it?  That makes me stop and wonder about this news/rumor.

I never quite understood why it was not as popular in the US as it has been in other regions around the world.  The initial models were not capable of remote control and shooting for some reason, which was corrected on later models.  

The M series compact MILC lineup was a good match to compete with Sony A6xxx bodies.   I would find it hard to believe that Canon would simply throw in the towel on that demographic.

[rs-eos]

The R-series line replaces it (EOS R50 and R100).

[kvbarkley]

"Wow, is Canon really discontinuing the M series without replacing it? That makes me stop and wonder about this news/rumor."

You make it sound like the market for interchangeable Lens cameras is growing and thriving. To survive you must be strongly differentiated from cell phone cameras and the M series was not that.

[shadowsports]

I think this decision was largely tied into size and convenience. People that want a tiny formfactor today are likely to bring their phone over a MILC camera. If you want small, the majority of people are going to pull out their phone. If you want more than point and shoot (which the M series is and isn't) then you are going all in for a larger body and lenses.

While the M series did offer significant versatility, it has been somewhat eclipsed by mobile devices. I'm OK with a larger body and am old enough now that this will probably not change. I'm willing to be inconvenienced, or to be the guy with the camera and big lenses. For others, maybe they don't want to carry or present themselves with this. I won't show up with a big camera and lens at a party or wedding, but if I'm out and about, I'll have my camera. Phones continue to get better, but I enjoy my larger camera. Smaller cameras had their place, but like it or not, mobile devices do a pretty good job now, they are all smaller and lighter than just about any M series camera, and lens combo. The M series was never for me, but I know a lot of people really liked it.  There are still plenty of choices / options available.  

[deebatman316]

With the advent of APS-C RF Mount cameras. There is no need for EF-M APS-C cameras anymore. Why have 2 separate incompatible Mounts when one works for both. No to mention different communication protocols between the RF Mount and the EF-M Mount.

[Tronhard]

I'm with you Rick as regards cell phones as cameras.  I will use them for things like reaching into awkward spots to record a serial number on a fridge, or take a photo of something at the supermarket. However, as far as photography goes, I want to use my dedicated cameras.
I actually still have several M5 bodies and about four EF-M lenses that are unlikely to sell, but you know what, they still take good photos, so they will have a place in my reduced arsenal of gear.  I have made the decision that, at this stage, I will not invest in R-series APS-C cameras, I will wait for a larger capacity FF body that will let me work in 1.6 crop mode and still give me a good size image file.

[Tronhard]

I agree that this has been coming for a long time, and makes total sense.  Canon have been supporting 5 mounts: EF-M, EF, EF-S, RF and RF-S for a while and that is totally unsustainable in the shrinking ILC market.  Next on the chopping block will be already shrinking range of DSLRs and their lenses, I wonder how long that will take...

[Waddizzle]

---

@rs-eos wrote:

The R-series line replaces it (EOS R50 and R100).

---

The R50 and R100 are both entry and beginner bodies, xxxxD and xxxD bodies, with feature sets comparable to the Rebel DSLRs.  The M Series had the M6, M50, M100, and M100.  All of those M bodies had feature sets that were comparable to the xxxD and xxD DSLRs.

[Waddizzle]

---

@kvbarkley wrote:

"Wow, is Canon really discontinuing the M series without replacing it? That makes me stop and wonder about this news/rumor."

You make it sound like the market for interchangeable Lens cameras is growing and thriving. To survive you must be strongly differentiated from cell phone cameras and the M series was not that.

---

I did not suggest the camera markets are growing.  I would disagree with that opinion of M Series bodies.  The image quality rivals that of midrange DSLRs, if not better.  

I do not know why M series are far more popular and widely accepted outside of the US.  Rather, I do not know why M series are not more popular and widely accepted in the US.

The M series bodes match up well against the Sony A6xxx bodies, not cell phones.  Nikon does not offer anything comparable.  Is Canon just going to back out and let Sony own the entry level MILC market?  That sounds crazy, to me.