cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

EOS R7 EVF Concerns about Effect on Vision

lovetoshoot2023
Enthusiast

Hi,

I'm currently shooting with a DSLR. One of my concerns about entering the mirrorless world is the effect that the EVF has on my vision. Can anyone share their experiences with making the transition? Do you know of any studies that have been done on the subject?  I'd like to move into the mirrorless world but have reservations. I'm currently considering the purchase of an R7.

 

 

16 REPLIES 16

Trevor,

Thank you for the extensive, thoughtful response.

I have been waiting for some time for a do-it-all camera in the price range of a photo enthusiast. The R7 seems like it would be perfect to capture stills of flying and perching birds as well as wide angle landscape compositions.  In analyzing my shooting I would use a combination of the EVF for birds and butterflies and the like and the LCD for landscape work.

I have no particular eyesight handicaps however I can't help wondering about the effects of this technology.

I appreciate the many personal responses to my question.

Denny

Thanks for your comment.

Denny

Hi Denny:
I can understand your desire to protect your vision, considering it is our most dominant sense and for photographers it is absolutely critical.  As I said, I think that trying it for yourself is the best plan.   
I did some digging and found an article from the NZ consumer institute (that is restricted to members, so I can't share it - sorry) the gist of which is that they tested EVFs from Canon, Nikon and Sony for their flagship and consumer cameras for eye strain after a similar inquiry by a member.   
While they said that the cheaper cameras lacked some of the finesse and resolution of the better units, they found no actual harm to health.  Their methodology was by using volunteers whose eyesight was tested and monitored by folks from the University of Auckland, and by also using technology to measure diffraction and interference as the cameras were moved, zoomed and rotated. 
The upshot was that they said they found no issues, but recommended (as they always do) taking one's eye away from the viewfinder and focusing on distant objects, which is generally good advice for any viewing of a digital device.


cheers, TREVOR

The mark of good photographer is less what they hold in their hand, it's more what they hold in their head;
"All the variety, all the charm, all the beauty of life is made up of light and shadow", Leo Tolstoy;
"Skill in photography is acquired by practice and not by purchase" Percy W. Harris

Trevor,

Thanks again for the information. I think you're probably right that the best idea might be to try something in the mirrorless category to see the result. I have come to the conclusion that if I want the latest innovation I'll have to to try an EVF.

Further to to your post, and this time specifically aimed at your intended use: "to capture stills of flying and perching birds as well as wide angle landscape compositions".

Since the R7 is an APS-C 'crop' sensor camera, it does not display the same field of view as the full-frame sensor bodies.  I enclose a link to an article I wrote on the implications of sensor size:
Focal Length, Field of View, Shutter Speed, Sensor Size &Equivalence 
The upshot of this that sensor size has both benefits and drawbacks.  At the wide angle end, for landscapes or shots in restricted spaces, the resultant Field of View (FoV) will be restricted and you will not get the full benefit of the optics of a wide-angle lens. However, on the telephoto end the FoV is restricted, creating an 'image boost' effect like using a longer focal length lens.  So there is not one perfect solution that fits all cases.

Logic suggests that one would go with the configuration that works for the most cases.  However, there is one more factor to consider that may be of assistance.  That is the MP resolution you need for what you produce.  Makers tout large MP sensor capacities, but if one is producing for social media, websites or digital display (which are becoming the dominant media) then a large MP sensor is not necessary as the images will be downsized in any case.  For example, the image size limit for this site is 5MP, which requires some serious downsizing of image before publication.

I had the benefit of being able to have both FF and crop sensor cameras through my career and still do, but I decided to make a choice when I went to the R-series Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera (MILC) system. I went full frame.  I did so when deciding on the Canon EOS R6, even though it is only a 20MP FF sensor.  To me, the benefits are that it has a definitely superior dynamic range over the 45MP R5 and a significant improvement over the R7. For example, tests and my own experience indicate that while the R7 exhibits noise above 3200 ISO, the R6 can be essentially noise free up to 10,500 ISO!  That means I can shoot in quite low light and get higher shutter speeds by raising the ISO.  The R6 has the ability to shoot in crop modes of 1.3 and 1.6 crop if one wants to compose in cropped mode.  The resultant MP capacity for 1.6 crop mode (the same as the R7 sensor) is about 8MP, but that is still absolutely fine for digital display and images up to 11"x14" prints.  I used to shoot much larger prints and even billboards using the 6.6MP Canon D60 from 2002!
There is now the R6MkII, which has a new sensor of 24MP, giving a crop sensor value of about 10MP, and that has pushed the cost of the R6 down quite a bit.  So, I would suggest investigating the suitability of the R6 for your needs.  In fact, one can even buy the 45MP R5 refurbished by Canon for just under $3,000.  This is a seriously high performing camera - FF, weather sealed lots of extra features.  Refurb units come with a guarantee:
Shop Canon Refurbished EOS R5 Body | Canon U.S.A., Inc.  While more expensive, you will get many years of service out of such a unit.


cheers, TREVOR

The mark of good photographer is less what they hold in their hand, it's more what they hold in their head;
"All the variety, all the charm, all the beauty of life is made up of light and shadow", Leo Tolstoy;
"Skill in photography is acquired by practice and not by purchase" Percy W. Harris

Further to my own post.  Here are a couple of images taken with the R6 of birds:
Canon EOS R6, Sigma 150-600 C @ 550mm, f/6.3, 1/150sec, ISO-200Canon EOS R6, Sigma 150-600 C @ 550mm, f/6.3, 1/150sec, ISO-200

Canon EOS R6MkII, RF 100-500@106mm, f/5.6, 1/200sec, ISO-100Canon EOS R6MkII, RF 100-500@106mm, f/5.6, 1/200sec, ISO-100
And at the wide-angle end:
Auckland Wintergarden: Canon EOS R6, RF 14-35mm@14mm, f/7.1, 1/400sec, ISO-100Auckland Wintergarden: Canon EOS R6, RF 14-35mm@14mm, f/7.1, 1/400sec, ISO-100


cheers, TREVOR

The mark of good photographer is less what they hold in their hand, it's more what they hold in their head;
"All the variety, all the charm, all the beauty of life is made up of light and shadow", Leo Tolstoy;
"Skill in photography is acquired by practice and not by purchase" Percy W. Harris

To paraphrase Shakespeare: There is nothing in this world so bad but thinking makes it so...
Or if you like another cliché: The proof of the pudding is in the eating! 🙂 


cheers, TREVOR

The mark of good photographer is less what they hold in their hand, it's more what they hold in their head;
"All the variety, all the charm, all the beauty of life is made up of light and shadow", Leo Tolstoy;
"Skill in photography is acquired by practice and not by purchase" Percy W. Harris
Announcements