Canon Rebel XSI

[emsplawn]

Hello

    I was wondering what is a good setting for taking pictures of a livestock show? My images are coming out really blurry.

Thank you in advance

[ebiggs1]

"You cannot go wrong with a 70-200mm f/2.8."

Totally love that lens. Bit I don't see a person owning and XSi popping for a $2000 dollar lens. In this case I believe a better camera is a better first buy.

[FloridaDrafter]

---

@ebiggs1 wrote:

"I don't have a problem using Tv and ISO to get proper exposure"

"What you are missing is in Tv mode you generally have fewer settings available." -SNIP-

Does it matter as long as the goal is achieved by getting a sharp well exposed image? Don't get me wrong, I do use Av at times, but I've never found any more settings that you don't get in TV. But as you mention below, we are trying to help the OP, and since he marked it solved, maybe we did.

"It is good you don't have problems getting proper exposure using Tv mode but we are not dealing with your shooting but trying to help the OP get proper exposed and sharper photos. You must keep in mind all camera/lens combos have their limits.  It is possible this is the case here and nothing short of better gear is the answer. In this case, adding light is also probably not an answer."

Actually, we are dealing with my shooting style/technique. I've used the XSi and similar lens to get the same types of shots I now go for with the 7D2 and 5D4, so I know that camera/lens and its capabilities. That is the only reason I gave advice.

---

[FloridaDrafter]

---

@emsplawn wrote:
Can y’all recommend a good lens for sports shootings.

---

I agree with everyone else that you would be better served upgrading your camera. But, I would first get to know the XSi, lens(es) that you have, and just get confortable using the various settings and modes on the XSi. Take the time to figure out what you really want from your photography and don't succumb to "lens lust", trust me, I've been there.

The XSi is capable of some really good shots, but as you grow as a photographer, you will want more I'm sure.

I just stepped out on the porch and caught this juvenile Northern Cardinal from around 30 feet away. XSi, 100-400mm L II lens (400mm), Tv 1/750th, ISO 1600, f/7, 50% cropped. The noise at ISO 1600 isn't as bad as I remember. Lighting is overcast and under trees. Shot Raw and processed in DPP 4.

[ebiggs1]

"Does it matter as long as the goal is achieved by getting a sharp well exposed image?"

It does if the advice you give has limited or no expectation of success.

"The noise at ISO 1600 isn't as bad as I remember."

Referencing your shot of the cardinal. High ISO numbers don't tend to show objectionable grain under good lighting situations. It is not usually the case as they are typically shot where they are asked to do miracles. Its the underexposing that  causes the grain to appear worse.

[FloridaDrafter]

Thanks for the discusion, Ernie! I hope everyone reading learned something.

Newton

[ebiggs1]

Thank you too! I love to have photography discussion like this with a rational person.  Some here are not so but thanx again and do keep it up. Keep shooting!