cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

300 DPI photos for Canon 6D

parklandphotos
Apprentice

How do I program my Canon 6D camera to get 300 dpi photos?

39 REPLIES 39


@ebiggs1 wrote:

" it is a printing spec."  Absolutely.

 

This is quite correct.  A photo has no dpi.  "Quit while you're ahead.", or in your case quit before you get further behind.


Absolutely.  When images are displayed on your computer monitor, they are printed to the screen.  That's how it works.

--------------------------------------------------------
"Enjoying photography since 1972."

A photo on your screen is shown as picture pixels. A photo on a screen has only a 'size' in pixels. So forget the dpi as it has no relevance here.

 

"...  in your case quit before you get further behind."  Now see what happened?  You got further behind!

EB
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.


@ebiggs1 wrote:

A photo on your screen is shown as picture pixels. A photo on a screen has only a 'size' in pixels. So forget the dpi as it has no relevance here.

 

"...  in your case quit before you get further behind."  Now see what happened?  You got further behind!


Obviously, you do not know how JPEG [not RAW] images are actually reproduced on your screeen.  Like I said, JPEG images are literally printed on your screen at the resolution specified by the metadata in the file.

--------------------------------------------------------
"Enjoying photography since 1972."

No wonder I have all these jpegs sticking to my screen! They are *literally* printed there!

 

What you said is really software dependent. Since jpeg and Exif are two different standards, they really don't have anything to do with each other.

jrhoffman75
Legend
Legend
Perhaps the organization is also creating a printed document as a record of the event/competition and they want to be sure they can reproduce quality images?
John Hoffman
Conway, NH

1D X Mark III, M200, Many lenses, Pixma PRO-100, Pixma TR8620a, Lr Classic

I would not want my images printed without my involvement. And again, it is easy enough to overide the dpi and print whatever size you want.

 

But the display thing is obviously untrue. with the exception of paint, all the programs I use on the PC open the images at a reasonable size, certainly not the default 72dpi that Canon has in its images!

"But the display thing is obviously untrue."

 

It must be a hard concept to understand.

EB
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.

"Obviously, you do not know how JPEG [not RAW] images are actually reproduced on your screeen."

 

"...  in your case quit before you get further behind."

You are going to get so far behind we won't be able to tell if it is you. Smiley Happy

It's OK because you are not the only one that gets confused with dpi.

EB
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.


@ebiggs1 wrote:

"Obviously, you do not know how JPEG [not RAW] images are actually reproduced on your screeen."

 

"...  in your case quit before you get further behind."

You are going to get so far behind we won't be able to tell if it is you. Smiley Happy

It's OK because you are not the only one that gets confused with dpi.


I am not confused about DPI.  I'm talking about scaling images for display at actual size on your monitor.  None of you seem to understand understand how software actually produces an image on your screen. 

 

The above comment about MS Paint proves my point.  And, he came so close to the truth, too.

--------------------------------------------------------
"Enjoying photography since 1972."

"But the display thing is obviously untrue. with the exception of paint, all the programs I use on the PC open the images at a reasonable size, certainly not the default 72dpi that Canon has in its images!"

 

Do you actually think Canon picked 72 DPI?  Let me tell you where it came from.   It is also currently the resolution standard used for displaying images on web pages, for historical reasons.

 

Once upon a time when PCs were first invented, text used to produced as an 8x8 dot matrix, both on your screen and on your dot matrix printer.  A single dot was used to separate adjacent characters.  This meant that each character occupied 9 pixels, and if you wanted to display 8 characters per inch, then you required 72 DPI to reproduce 8 characters per inch.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Full size" images are displayed on your screen at a lower resolution than what is actually saved in many files.  So, how do they go from X megapixels to your screen resolution?  As noted, MS Paint displays images without scaling the pixels to fit the screen.  Obviously, the images are rescaled in some fashion.  Depending upon the desired result, the scaling can be done in different ways.

 

To make a long story short, groups of pixels in the image file are averaged to produce one pixel that you see on your display.  At 300 DPI, that is approximately a 4x4 matrix [for a 72 DPI display] of pixels are processed to produce a single pixel of a given color.  A larger matrix, 8x8, would be capable of yielding higher color resolution per pixel.  A smaller matrix, 2x2, would have less color resolution. 

 

So, the "playing field is leveled" by requiring everyone to produce images at a specific DPI, and canvas size, so that everyone's images are scaled for viewing equally.

--------------------------------------------------------
"Enjoying photography since 1972."
Announcements