Sandhill crane in the front yard. They are everywhere here. The photo was in a whim but turned out pretty decent. R7, EF70-200mm f2.8L. ISO100, 200mm, f2.8, 1/800s.
I’m looking at the 24-70 and 28-70 RF L lenses. The 28-70 f2 does not have image stabilization. Is it really necessary? I’m sure there are places where it might and might not be, but I would appreciate help deciding. I’m glad to answer any questions ...
I never really thought about it but yes, you are correct. I started out with a Minolta X370 I got for Christmas when I was fourteen or fifteen. I got plenty of great photos with that thing! I still have it, but it hasn't been used or even been out of...
Thanks for the input. I pretty much had mymind made up to go with the 28-70 but I did want input from others before doing so. I appreciate all the feedback. The weight won’t be an issue as I’m already used to lugging around the 70-200 anyway. I can’t...
As I’m just getting back into this, I really can’t say what shutter speeds I anticipate. Looking at some photos I took at a band concert a week ago, most had higher shutter speeds with f2.8. But I’ve noticed that with such a wide aperture, my photos ...
Yes, thank you. It seems I misread somewhere. I also had the 24-105mm(?) in the comparison list and I’ll bet that’s where I got the other number. The reviews on the 28-70mm are fabulous though.
Great! Thank you! I was thinking, if the camera has internal stabilization, that makes the choice between the two lenses tougher. Someone said there was a pound of difference between the two but the specs on the Canon site only show a difference of a...
