02-28-2024 03:01 PM
I’m looking at the 24-70 and 28-70 RF L lenses. The 28-70 f2 does not have image stabilization. Is it really necessary? I’m sure there are places where it might and might not be, but I would appreciate help deciding. I’m glad to answer any questions that would help you give me helpful info. I like to shoot nature, but I’ve also taken up doing photos of different events at our kids school. Many of those involve lower lighting (performing arts stage and football stadium at night), but not a lot of fast motion shots. I don’t do sports. Thanks!
02-28-2024 03:42 PM
Greetings,
This is totally up to you. How steady is your hand. I love lens IS. You can be tired, fatigued shooting indoors in low light and dial your shutter speed down to something you think in your mind no way and you get a beautiful shot.
A full stop of light can make a difference. I prefer the 24-70 over the 28-70 because the heft of the 28 is 95mm. Its a fat heavy lens, and a full pound + heavier that the 24-70 which has a 82mm girth. I hand hold my 70-200 and 100-500 too, but both have IS.
I think you might want to look at the RF 70-200 f2.8 for low light performing arts, and sports related activities. If you aren't close to the stage, 70 isn't going to be enough, nor will it get you close enough to action on the field unless its right in front of you. You can also rent and compare side by side. Then pick the one you like best.
~Rick
Bay Area - CA
~R5 C (1.0.7.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve Studio ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 8 ~CarePaks Are Worth It
02-28-2024 03:54 PM
Thanks for the input. I have a 70-200 but it’s EF mount. I love it and it works quite well. I’ve just gotten back into photography though and I’ve got so much to figure out and learn. I have a Rebel DSLR and upgraded last year. My son is playing around with the old camera but he’s not really into it much. I’m sure I’m missing some functionality using the EF instead of the RF but I didn’t have the money to dump on it yet and at the time, I really wanted to be sure I was REALLY interested in sticking with it. The shorter lens is to fill the gaps when I’m interacting with the kids up close. 70 is too tight for closer group shots and stuff. I was looking at the f2 for more light. But the cameras seem to be so good that pushing the ISO real high doesn’t seem to be a big deal. I do wonder sometimes if I should have gone ahead with a full frame instead of the R7, but I really do like it. If the RF lens is indeed better than the EF, I guess I’ll be saving up for that next.
02-28-2024 04:02 PM - edited 02-28-2024 04:07 PM
If you have the choice between an EF and RF lens, and can afford it, I would always suggest the RF lens, both for stabilization, overall optical performance and, one day, if you sell it, what will the market be like for a legacy EF lens?
02-28-2024 04:41 PM - edited 02-28-2024 04:46 PM
Excellent advice from my esteemed colleagues, Trevor and Rick. But, please note that the R7 has "In Body Image Stabilization (IBIS)", so you won't be totally without IS. You will have to enable it when using a non-IS lens, start at page 290 in the users manual for options.
Newton
02-28-2024 04:46 PM - edited 02-28-2024 05:34 PM
Hi Newton, nice to catch up!
Yep, I was wondering if the OP has a camera body with IBIS as I cannot see a model mentioned.
At this time, the only bodies with IBIS are R3, R5 (not R5c), R6, R6II, (corrected omission: R7) and R8.
02-28-2024 05:02 PM
@Tronhard wrote:At this time, the only bodies with IBIS are R3, R5 (not R5c), R6, R6II, R8.
The Canon sales page specs for the R7 say "In-body IS operation can be selected when using a non-IS lens." It's also in the manual, with several options 🙂
I don't have the R7, although I just about bought it for the crop sensor, but after trying one and reading deeper, I passed. I was hoping for an R version of the 7D mark II.
Newton
02-28-2024 05:33 PM
Apologies Newton, I thought I had included the R7. It DOES have IBIS, so I will correct my list. Thank you for picking that up.
02-28-2024 05:56 PM
Me too Newton, I have written at some length about it's shortcomings in that respect... 😔
There is some suggestion of an R7II coming out later this year. It would need a major upgrade in image sensor (to BSI/stacked), buffer, one card Express CF and significantly upgraded focusing, plus a battery grip and more weather sealing (I realize that's a long list).
02-28-2024 05:39 PM
I had no idea! Yeah…that owners manual…holy cow it’s long.
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.1
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
07/01/2024: New firmware updates are available.
04/16/2024: New firmware updates are available.
RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF400mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF600mm F4 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF800mm F5.6 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
RF1200mm F8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.