08-07-2023 12:34 PM
Hi
Concerns: Canon C200 proper exposure in RAW with WFM
Some DOPs like Rubidium say: expose an 18% gray card at 42IRE when preset at C-log3 because this is what the canon papers recommend for C-Log2 and since RAW is recorded in C-Log2 in this camera, the IRE should be at 42 . (Cinematographer Ben Schubert also recommends 42 IRE but does not specify the preset !).
I have my doubts on all this because IRE values on the waveform monitor depend on the preset : C-Log3, C-Log, Rec709 or “OFF“.
Since there is no preset C-Log2 on the C200, you cannot use the recommended value of 42 IRE, you should use the recommended mid grey level value for the chosen preset.
On a graph published by CANON showing curves for “10 bit code value” versus “Relative stop from 18% grey” for BT709, C-Log, C-Log2 and C-Log3 (see pic below), you can read the 10bit code value for a zero deviation from 18%grey (middle bold vertical axis, which is the 10bit code value value for an 18% grey) and convert it to IRE. This yield approximately 35 IRE for C-Log3, and 44 IRE for BT709 (and 42 for C-Log2).
So my guess is that if you preset to Rec709, you set the exposure so that the 18%grey card shows 44 IRE on the waveform monitor.
Or if you preset C-Log3, the IRE should be 35 (and not 42 like Rubidium says. Ben Schubert does not specify the preset for his recommended 42 IRE ).
Am I correct or did I miss something ?
08-07-2023 12:18 PM
Hi
Concerns: Canon C200 proper exposure in RAW with WFM
Some DOPs like Rubidium say: expose an 18% gray card at 42IRE when preset at C-log3 because this is what the canon papers recommend for C-Log2 and since RAW is recorded in C-Log2 in this camera, the IRE should be at 42 . (Cinematographer Ben Schubert also recommends 42 IRE but does not specify the preset !).
I have my doubts on all this because IRE values on the waveform monitor depend on the preset : C-Log3, C-Log, Rec709 or “OFF“.
Since there is no preset C-Log2 on the C200, you cannot use the recommended value of 42 IRE, you should use the recommended mid grey level value for the chosen preset.
On a graph published by CANON showing curves for “10 bit code value” versus “Relative stop from 18% grey” for BT709, C-Log, C-Log2 and C-Log3, you can read the 10bit code value for a zero deviation from 18%grey (middle bold vertical axis, which is the 10bit code value value for an 18% grey) and convert it to IRE. This yield approximately 35 IRE for C-Log3, and 44 IRE for BT709 (and 42 for C-Log2).
So my guess is that if you preset to Rec709, you set the exposure so that the18%grey card shows 44 IRE on the waveform monitor.
Or if you preset C-Log3, the IRE should be 35 (and not 42 like Rubidium says. Ben Schubert does not specify the preset for his recommended 42 IRE ).
Am I correct or did I miss something ?
.
08-07-2023 12:24 PM
Perhaps you should post this question to the Video section.
08-07-2023 04:15 PM
Yes, thanks.
08-09-2023 05:41 PM
Hello yvesbernas,
Based on the chart and information provided by Canon, I would agree with your assessment.
12/18/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS C300 Mark III - Version 1..0.9.1
EOS C500 Mark II - Version 1.1.3.1
12/05/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.2
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.