cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

EOS 90D Advice on Auto White Balance settings

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi 

I was recently reading Understanding Exposure and am already on RAW and M, 99% of the time. Really enjoying the learning process and trying to work without things that say Auto. 

I wondered what the feelings and thoughts are on AWB settings - any good advice welcome 

Thanks 

Twiddler

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Anonymous
Not applicable

Thanks for your detailed replies. So it looks like I just stick to RAW and M and I'll learn to use the editing software to develop my skills. The thinking behind my question was whether the more experienced photographers bypass WB and do their own thing. So now I can stop worrying about another Auto feature on my camera controlling what I do. 

As ever Guys - Thanks for your help and understanding.

Twiddler

View solution in original post

23 REPLIES 23

p4pictures
Authority
Authority

Auto white balance is generally very good, it's one of Canon's significant strengths. In auto, the camera can actually apply different white balance at different parts of the image. If you have a scene lit by household lights, and daylight through a window the camera does a great job of balancing the different light colours and making a good looking result.

Since you shoot RAW you can change the white balance in your editing, either selecting one of the presets like daylight, tungsten, cloudy etc. or dialing in a Kelvin temperature value. A final option is to use the click white balance to select something that should be neutral toned in the frame and then use that to set the white balance. 

On the camera itself there are similar presets, and you can use them if you like. Some use shade or cloudy on an overcast day to add warmth to shots but I often find it a bit too warm for my taste.

 


Brian
EOS specialist trainer, photographer and author
-- Note: my spell checker is set for EN-GB, not EN-US --

Anonymous
Not applicable

Thanks Brian

That makes sense. I'll just set it on AWB and do any adjustments later, which is basically what I was doing. I got hooked on getting rid of anything with Auto in the title, trying to make my brain work!

Twiddler

Auto white balance to different parts of the image?That's fascinating.I'll see if i can find more info online.
How long has this been a thing?I've been out of photography for awhile

Auto white balance works like that for at least the last 20 years in Canon cameras. 


Brian
EOS specialist trainer, photographer and author
-- Note: my spell checker is set for EN-GB, not EN-US --

wq9nsc
Elite
Elite

I always shoot in RAW so the camera setting for white balance isn't critical.  Most of the time, auto white is fine but I frequently use white priority for sports under unusual lighting conditions.  This will often correct color shifts due to color temperature variation and even when fine adjustment is needed, it gets me very close.

Rodger

EOS 1DX M3, 1DX M2, 1DX, 5DS R, M6 Mark II, 1D M2, EOS 650 (film), many lenses, XF400 video

FloridaDrafter
Authority
Authority

I'm not sure if it's a MILC thing, but my Raw come in with  "Auto ambiance priority" as default WB adjustment (in DPP) and that works fine. It's nothing I intentionally set in the camera because, like Rodger, I shoot Raw and don't concern myself with WB. In fact, I seldom have to mess with it in post.

Newton

Never heard of that one! Thanks,i'll go check it out

Auto white balance gained the option to choose ambience priority and white priority in some of the DSLRs, certainly my EOS 5D Mark IV had the setting, and from a quick check so did EOS 5DS R and EOS SL3 (250D).

Originally Canon only offered the single auto white balance. By Canon engineers chose they elected to make it render warm toned scenes under tungsten lighting as warm. In some magazine and online reviews this was commented on quite often. So the engineers added the option for auto white balance with white priority to make the camera render tungsten with a more accurate white, but less of the ambience of the scene.

 


Brian
EOS specialist trainer, photographer and author
-- Note: my spell checker is set for EN-GB, not EN-US --

ebiggs1
Legend
Legend

"I wondered what the feelings and thoughts are on AWB settings - any good advice welcome "

This is a bit confusing. But WB and most all in-camera settings are no stored or do they effect a raw image. None of those settings, WB for instance is saved in a raw file which is essentially just ones and zeros. However when you upload to your computer or view them in the camera LCD screen they do show WB obliviously. The raw file can not be viewed as is so a conversion must be made. The raw converter which ever one you use, I.E., Photoshop, DPP4, etc., does use the camera settings to create that viewable image. But it is just a parameter to make the viewable image. You can set WB and/or most other settings as you please in a raw file. Even then it does not get backed into the raw file. About the only setting that does effect a raw file is exposure.  The raw file basically saves the unprocessed, uncompressed data directly from the camera's sensor without any in-camera adjustments like white balance or sharpening, etc. 

EB
EOS 1DX and 1D Mk IV and less lenses then before!
Announcements