canon lens

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-11-2016 02:38 PM
Hello
I am trying to decide weather to sell the 100-400 mk2 then get the sigma sport 150-600 i use 600d and 7d the 100-400 with 1.4x will not auto focus any advice? I watch a guy on you tube who hand holds the sigma 150-600 sport . are you sure its heavy.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-11-2016 03:06 PM - edited 03-11-2016 03:09 PM
What would be your reasoning for changing from the Canon to the Sigma? Ability to Auto Focus with the 1.4x? I would not expect the Sigma to auto focus any better with the extender than the Canon, due to their f/stops.
"Enjoying photography since 1972."
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-11-2016 03:36 PM
Both the 600D and 7D require a lens of f/5.6 or faster for autofocus. Thus if you want to add a 1.4x extender you need to start with a lens of f/4 or faster.
The Sigma is f/5-6.3, so it would autofocus in the short end, but would not autofocus at the high end.
Looks like before the lens gets to 400mm it falls below f/5.6.
Thus there would seem to be no advantage compared to the 100-400 w/1.4X. And the Canon Mk II lens is a fantastic lens.
Conway, NH
1D X Mark III, M200, Many lenses, Pixma PRO-100, Pixma TR8620a, Lr Classic

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-11-2016 03:40 PM
@paulbrogden10 wrote:Hello
I am trying to decide weather to sell the 100-400 mk2 then get the sigma sport 150-600 i use 600d and 7d the 100-400 with 1.4x will not auto focus any advice? I watch a guy on you tube who hand holds the sigma 150-600 sport . are you sure its heavy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkAat75_QGI
The 7D Mk II will autofocus with the EF 100-400 L IS II and a 1.4X TC.
Yes the Sigma 150-600 Sport is really that heavy. It weighs almost twice as much as the EF 100-400 L IS II (6.3 lbs vs 3.5 lbs). Of course you can handhold it, but, I can tell you from experience it is a pain to carry that heavy of a lens around.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-11-2016 03:43 PM
"The 7D Mk II will autofocus with the EF 100-400 L IS II and a 1.4X TC."
I think you can add the 5D Mk III, and all of the 1D series to that list of camera bodies that would work.
"Enjoying photography since 1972."

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-11-2016 03:44 PM
@jrhoffman75 wrote:
The Sigma is f/5-6.3, so it would autofocus in the short end, but would not autofocus at the high end.
Sigma lenses will AF at their long end on Canon EOS cameras despite the f/6.3 apperture.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-11-2016 03:49 PM
@Waddizzle wrote:"The 7D Mk II will autofocus with the EF 100-400 L IS II and a 1.4X TC."
I think you can add the 5D Mk III, and all of the 1D series to that list of camera bodies that would work.
I agree, I was trying to hint that it might be worth upgrading his camera to the 7D Mk II in this case rather than looking at a different lens. Going from a 7D to a 7D Mk II is a bigger jump in overall performance that most people realize. Another option would be the 80D which will AF with the EF 100-400 L IS II and a 1.4X TC III with 27 of it's 45 AF points not just the center one.
http://www.learn.usa.canon.com/resources/articles/2016/eos-80D/af_at_f8.shtml
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-11-2016 04:05 PM
"Another option would be the 80D which will AF with the EF 100-400 L IS II and a 1.4X TC III with 27 of it's 45 AF points not just the center one."
Yeah, I read that and have been experimenting with shooting more AF points than just the center. It doesn't work when you're trying to pick out a bird hidden in the branches, and there a lot of branches between you and the bird. Only the center AF point pulls that one off.
You guys have me looking up into the trees now.
"Enjoying photography since 1972."
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-11-2016 04:10 PM
"Yes the Sigma 150-600 Sport is really that heavy. It weighs almost twice as much as the EF 100-400 L IS II (6.3 lbs vs 3.5 lbs). Of course you can handhold it, but, I can tell you from experience it is a pain to carry that heavy of a lens around."
I have been weighing the pros and cons between those two lenses. I'm not the robust fellow that I used to be. I have been leaning more and more towards the Canon.
"Sigma lenses will AF at their long end on Canon EOS cameras despite the f/6.3 apperture."
I think he may have been referring to using the 1.4x extender with the lens.
"Enjoying photography since 1972."
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-11-2016 10:41 PM - edited 03-11-2016 10:41 PM
Why do you think you need the Sport vs the Contempory? What are your intended uses? AND I agree that a 7D2 may be a more cost effective upgrade. That said a 7D2 & 150-600 C is not that far off what just the Sport might cost.
