01-11-2024
12:48 PM
- last edited on
01-12-2024
09:06 AM
by
Danny
Looking for a single lens with decent range. My daughter travels quite a bit and wanted a hand me down, had my 60D cleaned and it's now hers for travel.
I would like to get her a single lens that would give her good range, was light enough to carry all day hiking and produced some good image quality. I was looking at the Sigma 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM C. The reviews for the most part are pretty good, they appear to have had a small challenge with the focus motor but overall for the amateur/hobbyist the feedback has been good. I found one used in excellent shape for $380.
Image stabilization and auto focus are a must have for the lens.
The question, if you were going to gift one lens with about the same spec and price what would you buy.
R3 ~ R5 ~ R6 Mk II ~ R50
Lenses: RF Trinity and others
Adobe and Topaz Suite for post processing
Personal Gallery
01-14-2024 01:05 PM
Gary the only point I meant to make is one off examples of any product not just lenses isn't proof that the entire run is the same. It may be that it's true. Unfortunately most if not all the reviews you see or read are from one off samples. BTW, DP review is one of the worst, IMHO, of course.
Let me give you an example with the Sigma 150-500mm super zoom. This was the first lens from Sigma in this category and as you can see it was 50mm and not the current 600mm. I bought one as I have said I love to play with lenses. I found it was awful. No to to bad IQ wise but the OS made it almost unusable. I sent it to Sigma. They supposedly fixed it and sent it back. No difference. I sold it with the disclaimer that the OS wasn't good. I bought another one and found it to be nearly as bad. I sent it to Sigma. They returned it and the lens which is still in my possession is fantastic. It is sharp and the OS works perfectly. As a rule I catalog l my lenses in an Access data base. Upon looking later on I found Sigma had sent me a brand new and different lens than the one I sent in.
I don't know what you can glean from that except anything made on a certain day or shift or tired employee or whatever perhaps can have issues but still does not condemn the entire model run. I don't know what amount would make a reasonable sample size but certainly dozens if not more.
I worked (40 years) for a large company that had a large photography department. It gave me access to a large inventory of camera gear and lenses. In some cases we had several copies of the same lenses. Even myself I was fortunate enough to obtain several copies of the same lens upon occasion. Not all of them but some.
My intention was not to rub you the wrong way but simply as information.
01-14-2024 01:34 PM
No hard feelings at all EB. I find that often when I join a forum of any type (not just photography) new members are often thought of as not knowing much (sometimes true, sometimes far from true). I simply get a little defensive when someone doubts something that I know to be true. (hey, we all have our faults).
Bottom line, it's like you said "I don't know what you can glean from that except anything made on a certain day or shift or tired employee or whatever perhaps can have issues but still does not condemn the entire model run. I don't know what amount would make a reasonable sample size but certainly dozens if not more." and I've found enough from reliable sources to know that this particular lens did have a number of soft ones back when I purchased this in 2010... the main one being the camera shop where the pros there had well more than the usual complaints about this lens that year. So yes, I think your comment is a perfect example of what happened that year with these.
I would never condemn a whole line, and especially if you were to purchase new. My main point is that if you find a used one, it just might be one of these since any of the soft ones would be more likely to be traded in. I supposed I worded my original reply poorly, by saying "good chance" instead of simply "chance".
I also saw your comment about the EF-S 18-200mm. Funny thing... I bought two Canon kits in 2010. My wife used to shoot Olympus, I used to shoot Pentax... we decided to both switch to Canon and start sharing lenses. We bought the (new at the time) 60D... one kit had the 18-135, the other kit had the 18-200. We normally prefer better glass, but thought we couldn't argue with the price. The 18-200mm kit lens was very sharp, and I agree with your recommendation. What was funny is when we first switched systems we only had 4 Canon lenses for the first few months (two nifty fiftys and the zooms) so when we wanted a zoom, we would each try to grab the 18-200 first. 😄
01-25-2024 12:40 PM
I just bought a used Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DI-II VC AF lens from Adorama for $119.00 that I really like. It's not too heavy. Using it on a Canon T6s
02/20/2025: New firmware updates are available.
RF70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Z - Version 1.0.6
RF24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z - Version 1.0.9
RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.8
RF50mm F1.4 L VCM - Version 1.0.2
RF24mm F1.4 L VCM - Version 1.0.3
01/27/2025: New firmware updates are available.
12/18/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS C300 Mark III - Version 1..0.9.1
EOS C500 Mark II - Version 1.1.3.1
12/05/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.2
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.