12-03-2022 10:51 AM
Wondering to get either a 1.4 or a 2X extender with the Rf 100-500 lens. Two concerns, one is a lot of wildlife photography is in lower lighting conditions and the 2X drops it to 11/14. Also, was surprised to see that the extender only works 300-500mm (not 1-299mm). Anyone have any experience with this lens and extenders?
05-07-2023 09:56 AM
I just re-read the entire thread and realized I missed one your questions. You can't attach the TC to the 100-500 until the zoom is set to 300 or >. When you zoom out, the zoom stops at 300mm. Like any zoom when you reach the start or end of its range. 300-500mm when mounted. The zoom behaves like the Sigma. No extender - when you go from 100 > 500 its a 2 grip twist. From 300-500 its a single grip, twist. Short throw. Just something I noticed when I test fitted. These are the zoom ranges you'll be at anyway when using the extender.
~Rick
Bay Area - CA
~R5 C (1.0.7.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve Studio ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 8 ~CarePaks Are Worth It
05-07-2023 11:55 AM
Yeah, there's no reason to use the extender at anything under 300 because the lens will get you there (well, almost) without it...unless you're just getting too much light. 😋 Thanks again Rick and I hope you enjoy your Sunday!
05-13-2023 06:35 PM
I did some testing today comparing the Sigma 150-600 C to the RF100-500 +1.4x extender. With both lenses zoomed all the way (600mm and 700mm respectively). I set the Sigma lens at F/8 and the Canon at F/10, at 1/1000. I adjusted the ISO to compensate for the Canon's smaller aperture. I used a tripod and turned off image stabilization for both lenses. It's really hard to tell the difference at the center of the images, but I think the Canon has just a slight edge. Some of this may be due to the extra 100mm, but in some images, it looked a smidge sharper. Out towards the edges though, the Canon was clearly superior. I was photographing still objects (a telephone pole, a palm tree, and a different tree). I turned on IS and I could see the Sigma focus point dancing around while the Canon was much more stable. I think this might give the Canon a bit of an advantage when shooting moving subjects hand-held. Here's a couple shots that show what I'm talking about.
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.1
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
07/01/2024: New firmware updates are available.
04/16/2024: New firmware updates are available.
RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF400mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF600mm F4 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF800mm F5.6 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
RF1200mm F8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.