ARE YOU KIDDING? - Lens availability

[boreynolds]

I can't believe you're still in business! It's 2024 and you STILL have no lenses for your mirrorless AFFORDABLE cameras! WHY ARE YOU EVEN MAKING cameras like the R50, R100, R10, R7???? Are you stupid? 

[boreynolds]

Yes, I think I may have OVER-GENERALIZED with my post considering the feedback I've gotten. I appreciate your reply, thank you

[krahe]

---

But they do have RF-S lenses, which are made for APS-C bodies.  Not many, but some.  Besides, most RF full frame lenses will work fine on APS-C bodies.  

---

That's not really an answer, for an R50/R100 can only approach the ergonomics of an M50 when using an RF-S lens. When using an RF or even an adapted EF/EF-S lens on an R50/R100, you lose over 5.5cm^2 of body surface area compared to an M50 with an EF-M or even adapted lens.

[Waddizzle]

Canon didn’t release an abundance of EF-S lenses.  They were not many EF-S lenses released beyond the kit lenses and a couple of ultra wide angle zooms.

[justadude]

"That's not really an answer, for an R50/R100 can only approach the ergonomics of an M50 when using an RF-S lens. When using an RF or even an adapted EF/EF-S lens on an R50/R100, you lose over 5.5cm^2 of body surface area compared to an M50 with an EF-M or even adapted lens."

But the question was on lens availability, not ergonomics.  I'm not saying ergonomics isn't important Kevin, because it is, but it is simply a whole other subject that was not even asked.  So yes, I stand by my answer on using RF and EF lenses with adapters as part of the solution to the original question asked about lens availability.

[justadude]

"Canon didn’t release an abundance of EF-S lenses.  They were not many EF-S lenses released beyond the kit lenses and a couple of ultra wide angle zooms."

Very true, my friend!  Most of the lenses I used on my APS-C DSLRs were full frame lenses that I also used on my full frame bodies.  Other than the kit EF-S kit lenses I always thought it was a waste of money to buy a new EF-S lens that I could only use on one body, instead of an EF lens I could use on both.  I'm sure many photographers thought the same... as well as Canon.  The only EF-S lens that I ever purchased (besides the kit) was a used Sigma 10-20mm for a dirt cheap price.  That was a fun lens!

[justadude]

"For the APSC Body's"


I did catch that originally.  Keep in mind that the RF lenses were also made to work on APS-C bodies, and are marketed that way.  Screenshot below is from the Canon web site.  You will see this on the specs for ALL of the RF lenses.  So there are a lot of lens choices for APS-C cameras.

[krahe]

I got the impression that the OP was looking for lenses specifically designed for the APS-C sensor bodies, rather than any lens that could be attached or adapted to it. The benefit being sought wasn't clear but could be ergonomics or perhaps lower cost as well.

[LeeP]

Aside from the "endearing" tone of the post...(what purpose did the negativity serve?)

I'm looking at a 15-30mm RF zoom that is a rather sweet lens and VERY affordable. Next to it is the recently introduced 75-300mm RF zoom that is a total steal.

Affordable RF lenses ARE available.

I've never never bought the top-of-the-line photo equipment in my 45+ years as a working photographer because I believe that the skill of the photographer what makes the photograph.

And I have the body of work to prove it.

[boreynolds]

No, you're right, I think I may have had a beer or or Titos and Soda in me when I wrote that post EARLY in my RF life. Apologies. I have since purchased SEVERAL EF and Sigma lenses. Although I still think it's weird to release ANY body without supporting the lenses. Even with the M50 Canon made several for that body that were WONDERFUL boutique type lenses. The 22mm F2.0 the 55-250 tele, even the KIT lens the 15-45 was not a bad lens for a kit lens but, almost NOTHING for the so called "upgrade" to that camera body? Again, apologies for the negativity that served nothing.

Bo

[boreynolds]

No, you're right, I think I may have had a beer or or Titos and Soda in me when I wrote that post EARLY in my RF life. Apologies. I have since purchased SEVERAL EF and Sigma lenses. Although I still think it's weird to release ANY body without supporting the lenses. Even with the M50 Canon made several for that body that were WONDERFUL boutique type lenses. The 22mm F2.0 the 55-250 tele, even the KIT lens the 15-45 was not a bad lens for a kit lens but, almost NOTHING for the so called "upgrade" to that camera body? Again, apologies for the negativity that served nothing.

Bo