ARE YOU KIDDING? - Lens availability

[boreynolds]

I can't believe you're still in business! It's 2024 and you STILL have no lenses for your mirrorless AFFORDABLE cameras! WHY ARE YOU EVEN MAKING cameras like the R50, R100, R10, R7???? Are you stupid? 

[Danfaz]

Canon has no lenses for its mirrorless affordable cameras?

[shadowsports]

I count 17 RF lenses below $800.  😀

I guess everyone has their definition of affordable.

[stevet1]

lenses? I don't need no stinking lenses.

I just point the stupid camera in the general direction of the stupid subject and push da stupid button.

Steve Thomas

[justadude · Accepted solution]

"I count 17 RF lenses below $800."

I came here to say the same thing.  Maybe someone is hoping that Canon will have a lens giveaway day.  🙂

[boreynolds]

As the original post says For their APSC cameras. 

[boreynolds]

For the APSC Body's

[Tintype_18]

Affordable is one of those "open ended" terms, revolving around one's income. As an aside, there is a lot locally about affordable housing...two new subdivisions which are advertised from high 200s to low 300s. Hello?

[justadude]

But they do have RF-S lenses, which are made for APS-C bodies.  Not many, but some.  Besides, most RF full frame lenses will work fine on APS-C bodies.  

[ebiggs1]

"As the original post says For their APSC cameras."

Any RF or RF-s lens is a APSC lens. It's the other way around where the RF-s isn't such a good idea but even they still work. Keep in mind all EF and EF-s work some say even better than they ever did. Then there is the used market. I have seen used, or preowned, EF 50mm f1.8 lenses go for $50 to $60 bucks. 

[ebiggs1]

"As the original post says For their APSC cameras."

Any RF or RF-s lens is a APSC lens. It's the other way around where the RF-s isn't such a good idea but even they still work. Keep in mind all EF and EF-s work some say even better than they ever did. Then there is the used market. I have seen used, or preowned, EF 50mm f1.8 lenses go for $50 to $60 bucks.