cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

ARE YOU KIDDING? - Lens availability

boreynolds
Contributor

I can't believe you're still in business! It's 2024 and you STILL have no lenses for your mirrorless AFFORDABLE cameras! WHY ARE YOU EVEN MAKING cameras like the R50, R100, R10, R7???? Are you stupid? 

23 REPLIES 23

No, you're right, I think I may have had a beer or  Titos and Soda in me when I wrote that post EARLY in my RF life. Apologies. I have since purchased SEVERAL EF and Sigma lenses. Although I still think it's weird to release ANY body without supporting the lenses. Even with the M50 Canon made several for that body that were WONDERFUL boutique type lenses. The 22mm F2.0 the 55-250 tele, even the KIT lens the 15-45 was not a bad lens for a kit lens but, almost NOTHING for the so called "upgrade" to that camera body? Again, apologies for the negativity that served nothing.

Bo

No, you're right, I think I may have had a beer or Titos and Soda in me when I wrote that post EARLY in my RF life. Apologies. I have since purchased SEVERAL EF and Sigma lenses. Although I still think it's weird to release ANY body without supporting the lenses. Even with the M50 Canon made several for that body that were WONDERFUL boutique type lenses. The 22mm F2.0 the 55-250 tele, even the KIT lens the 15-45 was not a bad lens for a kit lens but, almost NOTHING for the so called "upgrade" to that camera body? Again, apologies for the negativity that served nothing.

Bo

I think I may have had a beer or Titos and Soda in me when I wrote that post EARLY in my RF life. Apologies. I have since purchased SEVERAL EF and Sigma lenses. Although I still think it's weird to release ANY body without supporting the lenses. Even with the M50 Canon made several for that body that were WONDERFUL boutique type lenses. The 22mm F2.0 the 55-250 tele, even the KIT lens the 15-45 was not a bad lens for a kit lens but, almost NOTHING for the so called "upgrade" to that camera body? Again, apologies for the negativity that served nothing.

Bo

The EF-M line was introduced to be a complete line of lenses on its own.  This was not the case with the EF-s line. The EF-S was more of a supplement to the EF line, filling needs unique to crop sensor bodies.

You seem to be wanting RF-S primes.  Canon is not about to start releasing redundant products.  The cost difference between a crop and full frame prime would be small.

--------------------------------------------------------
"Enjoying photography since 1972."
Holiday
Announcements