10-15-2023 06:10 AM - edited 10-16-2023 11:06 AM
It's slightly annoying that when using the DPP ver 4. The 'Start HDR Compositing Tool', does some good work with the photos in many cases, not in all cases. But when its used, there seems to be no way to have it save with the 'Camera' data. You know like 'Camera Maker', 'Camera Model', 'F-Stop', 'Exposure Time', 'ISO-Speed'....
All of that data is lost when saving the file using this method.
EDIT: This is for processing one image at a time. Not multiple images in the HDR screen. I realize that the function is called 'Composite', but I've only used the function with one image. Maybe few have discovered it's usefulness.
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-16-2023 08:23 AM - edited 10-16-2023 10:01 AM
Really the answer to the question involves 3 parts. 1) First I edited my original post above to include. That this is only about processing "One Image" in the HDR Processing screen. I've never tried to process more than one at once, and didn't know it's purpose, that of processing more than one, and doing some-sort-of combination of images. Combining images was not apart of the question at all. 2) As Shadowsports points out. A feature request seems logical. (Although his example was a Star Trek motion picture transporter accident). I will post a simple example, of one photo, not an "oh no they're forming" example. (umm that's a quote from the movie if you didn't get it...) Could the processing be done in another tool? Maybe, but the work is done for me already, why not use it, before I have to. And the results sometimes are where I need it. 3) Using the Exiftool is the ticket to fix the problem in the mean-time, if its that important to me. I can add the data back in from the original .CR3 file. It was not exactly what others had posted on this thread, but rather reminding me of the tool. So that's what prompted me to look up how to copy one files data to another. So all I'll need to do is: exiftool -TagsFromFile {file...}.CR3 {File... HDR-Processed}.jpg
10-16-2023 07:47 AM
As I mentioned to Waswizzizle.. I've never used the function to process more than one file at once. I see that it offered the option, but never knew what it was for. I was just happy with the results the HDR-option was producing for 'one image' at a time. Now I see what you guys are talking about, but your missing the concept how great the function is when processed on just one image, and since it's being used on just one image.... there is no reason to throw out the 'data' on the one image.
10-15-2023 05:57 PM
While others have mentioned that some of the exif data would differ among the photos composited, it would be possible to use exiftool to copy the metadata from one of the raw files that you think represents the image closely enough.
For example, I did this to copy information to a composite:
exiftool -TagsFromFile IMG_6759.CR3 -makernotes -make -model DC_IMG_6759-6764.JPG exiftool -TagsFromFile IMG_6764.CR3 -Canon:Image:FocusDistanceUpper DC_IMG_6759-6764.JPG
The focus distance for both the first image (FocusDistanceLower) and last image (FocusDistanceUpper) was then in the composite image as well as the ISO, focal length, and shutter speed.
10-15-2023 10:49 PM
“.If you cannot write some of the data, I guess the best compromise is to write none of the data.“
If the above statement does not make any to you, then it does not make any sense for me to continue repeating myself. The solution you want simply doesn’t exist. Never will.
10-16-2023 08:23 AM - edited 10-16-2023 10:01 AM
Really the answer to the question involves 3 parts. 1) First I edited my original post above to include. That this is only about processing "One Image" in the HDR Processing screen. I've never tried to process more than one at once, and didn't know it's purpose, that of processing more than one, and doing some-sort-of combination of images. Combining images was not apart of the question at all. 2) As Shadowsports points out. A feature request seems logical. (Although his example was a Star Trek motion picture transporter accident). I will post a simple example, of one photo, not an "oh no they're forming" example. (umm that's a quote from the movie if you didn't get it...) Could the processing be done in another tool? Maybe, but the work is done for me already, why not use it, before I have to. And the results sometimes are where I need it. 3) Using the Exiftool is the ticket to fix the problem in the mean-time, if its that important to me. I can add the data back in from the original .CR3 file. It was not exactly what others had posted on this thread, but rather reminding me of the tool. So that's what prompted me to look up how to copy one files data to another. So all I'll need to do is: exiftool -TagsFromFile {file...}.CR3 {File... HDR-Processed}.jpg
10-16-2023 05:21 PM
Exiftool needs two parameters in addition to TagsFromFile when the destination image has had the makernotes section stripped out. Exiftool also needs "-make -model".
exiftool -TagsFromFile IMG_6759.CR3 -makernotes -make -model DC_IMG_6759-6764.JPG
10-16-2023 05:38 PM
That's funny I don't appear to be missing anything. I was just following the internet instructions. The image below is from my command.
12/18/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS C300 Mark III - Version 1..0.9.1
EOS C500 Mark II - Version 1.1.3.1
12/05/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.2
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.