Being a Canon F1 film user with FD lenses, i started with the first DIgital Rebel, went to a 20D, then a 40D, jumped to a 1D MKIIN, the a 5D3 and then a 5D4 and now an R5. i still have many many shots taken with a my 20 and 40D's. Is it me, many of ...
I appreciate those that offered intuitive feedback. I certainly was not comparing the improvements with low light noise, auto focus improvements and other technological advances. I was more interested in have the advancements on any technology had a ...
It wasn’t really the subject as much as the sharpness, and lack of noise and moire in the photo. I was trying to stimulate conversation as we went to 50mp cameras and super senssors, are the pictures under similar conditions and sublect matters , tha...
Jury is in for me. Tested my RF 100-500 , today without the 1.4 RF tc. That’s next. No comparison to my 100-400 II. For me the R5, 100-400 II PLUS 1.4 III, and the adaptor. Was not a winning combination. 100-500rf was.
Quick update I went out again today and this time my buddy and I switched lenses, with our R5s. I took his RF 100-500, and he took my 100-400 with my adaptor. ( he’s had no R5 issues) As predicted all hand held , his were softer than he’s used to, an...
Owning 5D 3 and 5D 4, I am disappointed in my R5, at least handheld in comparison. Ive done mechanical shutter and electric. All tested with this lens. R5 are the least sharp. Tried IS on and off. At 100% crop the first one of a burst is not bad , bu...