05-01-2013 07:10 PM - edited 05-05-2013 10:54 AM
UPDATED May 5:
I apologize to the forum for mixing two different problems. They are unrelated.
Problem #1: User error. I thought I was using a class 6 SD card but I was wrong. The yellow "!" indicates a pathologically slow card. Upgrading to a class 10 resolved this problem.
Problem #2: UNRESOLVED. Red battery indicator comes on prematurely. On a fresh charge, it'll turn red after recording for a couple of minutes. On a partially drained battery, it turns red immediately upon entering movie mode or pressing the record button. Turn the camera off and then right back on in "still" mode and it shows full charge and works fine ... until trying to shoot video. I have not precisely measured recording times but it'll record for at least 20 (maybe 30?) minutes while flashing red.
01-15-2014 01:40 PM
yes, I guess that's the reason they didn't make a lot of fuzz about it, it was a quite "silent" modification to the battery
01-17-2014 09:51 AM - edited 01-17-2014 09:52 AM
I have bought a "new" SX280 from Amazon on January 2014 and the battery says it was manufactured on April 2013. What would you think, Is it important? What is the expected life of the NB-6L battery ?
01-17-2014 12:35 PM
Have you read any of the 800 + pages of complaints concerning this camera on this web site? The multitudes of complaints have also spilled over to other web sites including Amazon's, DP Review and a few more. Good luck and don't expect much help from Canon.
01-17-2014 12:37 PM
01-17-2014 02:27 PM
The battery was manufactured on April 2013 because that's when the sx280s started rolling off the assembly line. It's not important. An NB-6L is an NB-6L. You can expect precisely the same experiences that we've all been reporting. The camera is a lemon. Period.
01-17-2014 02:49 PM
I cant really get convinced, it can't be true with all the specialized reviews and noone saying nothing about this.
01-17-2014 03:06 PM
(facepalm)
Go to your favorite search engine, type in "sx280 battery" and you'll see hundreds of the kind of 'specialized' reviews that really count - from customers who've plunked down their own hard-earned cash on this camera and experienced the same flaw. Ask the guy on page 85 who ignored the ample customer complaints about this camera, bought it anyway and took it on his honeymoon - only to see it shut off when he needed it most. Buyer beware.
01-18-2014 03:47 AM - edited 01-18-2014 03:49 AM
So if we all were to believe Canon is not trying to fix this problem what would all we doing at Canon's website?
If we were to believe Canon took advantage of us and doesn't care how is it that is already a new thread asking for a new model from Canon replacing the SX280? Wouldn't it be more reasonable all of us would be far away from Canon and from this site? I firmly believe Canon is not going to dissapoint us, it has a name to take care of.
01-18-2014 04:05 AM
01-18-2014 04:28 AM
So what are you doing in the forum?
02/20/2025: New firmware updates are available.
RF70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Z - Version 1.0.6
RF24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z - Version 1.0.9
RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.8
RF50mm F1.4 L VCM - Version 1.0.2
RF24mm F1.4 L VCM - Version 1.0.3
01/27/2025: New firmware updates are available.
12/18/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS C300 Mark III - Version 1..0.9.1
EOS C500 Mark II - Version 1.1.3.1
12/05/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.2
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.