cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Advice on beginner camera/lens

matirdamb
Apprentice

Recently went on a trip and had the opportunity to use a canon m50 that my girlfriend was kind enough to share with me. Honestly fell in love with taking pictures (even though i literally knew nothing about what I was doing). Since I've gotten back it's been the only thing I've been able to think about, it just scratches an itch that i didn't know I had.

Anyways Ive done some research and have either settled on getting a eos r50 or the eos r10. I'm leaning towards getting the r10 since I'm the kind of person that grows out of beginner things quite quickly, and I know the r10 just has more to offer for the price. The main question I have now is, do I get the r10 kit with a 18-150 lens for $1300, or do I get just the r10 body for about $900 and buy a lens for 200-400. But if i should go for the second option, what lens should i look at. Im mostly interested in landscape and portrait photography, i know that can make a difference in lens choice. Any advice/help would be very welcome. Super new to this, but very enthusiastic to learn and explore!

3 REPLIES 3

jrhoffman75
Legend
Legend

@matirdamb wrote:

Recently went on a trip and had the opportunity to use a canon m50 that my girlfriend was kind enough to share with me. Honestly fell in love with taking pictures (even though i literally knew nothing about what I was doing). Since I've gotten back it's been the only thing I've been able to think about, it just scratches an itch that i didn't know I had.

Anyways Ive done some research and have either settled on getting a eos r50 or the eos r10. I'm leaning towards getting the r10 since I'm the kind of person that grows out of beginner things quite quickly, and I know the r10 just has more to offer for the price. The main question I have now is, do I get the r10 kit with a 18-150 lens for $1300, or do I get just the r10 body for about $900 and buy a lens for 200-400. But if i should go for the second option, what lens should i look at. Im mostly interested in landscape and portrait photography, i know that can make a difference in lens choice. Any advice/help would be very welcome. Super new to this, but very enthusiastic to learn and explore!


My suggestion would be the kit you referenced. The 18-150 lens is a good all around  lens. Since it is small, light and inexpensive consider adding  the 16mm lens for landscape. 

John Hoffman
Conway, NH

R6 Mark III, M200 (converted to infrared), RF lenses, Pixma PRO-100, Pixma TR8620a, Lr Classic

stevet1
Elite
Elite

matirdamb,

While the 200-400 would give you the opportunity to shoot far-away shots, my advice would be to get the 18-150 for the flexibility of wide vista shots as well as things that are only 5 - 10 feet away from you.

Steve Thomas

March411
Authority
Authority

Also a consideration with going to a longer lens is In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS) which none of the bodies you mentioned in your post have installed. As you get into longer lenses it's not required but a huge bonus unless you have a very steady hand. 

The RF-S 18-150mm Steve mention does have 4.5 stops of IS as well as the  RF100-400mm F5.6-8. which will help. 

If the budget allows you may also want to look at the R7 which will give you more megapixels and IBIS. The combination of the body and a lens with IS will provide about 8 stops of IS. 


Marc
Windy City

R5 Mk II ~ R6 Mk III ~ R7
Lenses: RF Trinity and others
Adobe and Topaz Suite for post processing

Personal Gallery

Announcements