cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

HDR for RTF

ebiggs1
Legend
Legend

Some are 'ordinary' aren't they?

 

_D3X7554-HDR.jpg

EB
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.
28 REPLIES 28

ebiggs1
Legend
Legend

...and....

 

_DS33217.jpg

EB
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.


@ebiggs1 wrote:

...and....

 

_DS33217.jpg


Nice shot. <chuckle!> You could hardly have known this, Ernie, but I played the French horn in high school and college. I even wrapped mine with electrical tape, just like that one.

Bob
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA


@ebiggs1 wrote:

Some are 'ordinary' aren't they?

 

_D3X7554-HDR.jpg


This one looks a little soft to me, but we'll overlook that because it's hardly the point. These qualify as good HDR shots because it's not obvious why HDR was needed. The HDR shots that I disparage are those that look artificial but have little or no redeeming artistic value. These do look natural, presumably because the technology made them so.

Bob
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA

RTF,

Might be a little soft because it was hand held.  Plus there was almost no light besides the tree.  Real photographers find a way!  Smiley Happy

EB
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.

Ernie, you should post these [and your others like the power lines] in the "Share Your Photos" forum, too.  I don't think that there is an HDR thread, yet.  All the photos that RTF says he dislikes.

 

CT7D2016_12_140281-HDR.jpg

 

Here's a shot that I'm still trying to figure out what I could have done better.  Multiple WB settings and [wide] Dynamic Range everywhere.

--------------------------------------------------------
"Enjoying photography since 1972."


@RobertTheFat wrote:

@ebiggs1 wrote:

Some are 'ordinary' aren't they?

 

_D3X7554-HDR.jpg


This one looks a little soft to me, but we'll overlook that because it's hardly the point. These qualify as good HDR shots because it's not obvious why HDR was needed. The HDR shots that I disparage are those that look artificial but have little or no redeeming artistic value. These do look natural, presumably because the technology made them so.


Maybe a little soft(?) gives a nostalgic quality to it.  It is a timeless photo, that could have been shot yesterday or decades ago.

--------------------------------------------------------
"Enjoying photography since 1972."

Ernie, that photo of the French horn really caught my eye.. that's a beautiful shot.  

 

You're getting a bit of a reflection off the wrapping paper (maybe a polarizer could help subdue that) but it's still a wonder photo.

 

BTW... what means "RTF"?  Apologies if I should know this (and or if my brain is just too tired at the end of a long day).

 

Tim Campbell
5D III, 5D IV, 60Da


@TCampbell wrote:

Ernie, that photo of the French horn really caught my eye.. that's a beautiful shot.  

 

You're getting a bit of a reflection off the wrapping paper (maybe a polarizer could help subdue that) but it's still a wonder photo.

 

BTW... what means "RTF"?  Apologies if I should know this (and or if my brain is just too tired at the end of a long day).

 


He means me.

Bob
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA

"BTW... what means "RTF"?"

 

Smiley Very Happy  Yes it does refer to Bob from Boston.  The biggest critic of HDR I know!  The reflection of the wrapping and chimney was a feature and I tried hard to make sure it was there.  That shot has gotten some nice comments from the school and I am deeply humbled by it.  It is the opening slide of a slideshow for the kids er, ah, I mean young musicians.

EB
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.
Announcements