05-14-2015 05:53 PM
What about cloudy days/overcast days...does anyone still use filters of any kind to make the pictures come out better?
05-14-2015 06:10 PM
Hello illininutt!
Welcome to the Canon Forums and thanks for your post!
To have a better understanding of your issue, please let everyone know what camera you are using (EOS Rebel SL1, EOS 6D, PowerShot SX50 HS, PowerShot G15, etc.). That way, the community will be able to assist you with suggestions appropriate for your product.
Any other details you'd like to give will only help the Community better understand your issue!
If this is a time-sensitive matter, our US-based technical support team is standing by, ready to help 24/7 via Email at http://bit.ly/EmailCanon or by phone at 1-800-OK-CANON (1-800-652-2666) weekdays between 10 AM and 10 PM ET (7 AM to 7 PM PT).
Thanks!
05-14-2015 06:24 PM
05-14-2015 09:11 PM
Using a polarizing filter (even on a cloudy day) will still help reduce reflections. Just point the camera (with filter) at a car window and twist the filter and you'll see the effects.
I use ND filters usually to deliberately allow me to imply motion blur into a shot. I still use them on overcast days... but I can get away with a weaker filter. I also sometimes use them to allow me to shoot with flash while outdoors and get away with setting a lower focal ratio (to blur backgrounds).
I also use "gradient neutral density" filters on cloudy days. The sky is always brighter than the ground (if the sky is as dark as the ground... you should probably run for cover.) Darkening just the upper (sky) part of the image using a grad ND helps brighten the ground and intensifies the drama in the sky.
05-15-2015 03:49 PM - edited 05-15-2015 03:50 PM
@illininutt wrote:What about cloudy days/overcast days...does anyone still use filters of any kind to make the pictures come out better?
The single most useful filter you can buy is a Circular Polarizer. It can be used on sunny days to make the blue of the sky deeper and white clouds really pop out. It also is very helpful on overcast days, to reduce the reflection of the sky. You might be surprised by how much reflection there is off foliage, for example. Reducing the reflection of the white/gray overcase sky really brings out the color and contrast... of green leaved in Spring and Summer or all the varous reds, oranges and yellows in the Fall.
The image below, for example, was done in the shade with a C-Pol filter to help saturate the colors better...
Heck, a C-Pol can even be useful shooting portraits. If a person has shiny skin, or wears eyeglasses, use one to control the reflections.
A lot of what can be done with a C-Pol filter cannot be replicated in post-processing. That's not the case with most other filters... many can be applied later, with the right software, in your computer. So, shooting digital images you really don't need a lot of filters, not nearly as many as we did in the days of film. But it's still bery worthwhile to get and use a quality C-Pol.
There are times you don't want to use any filter... and a C-Pol "costs" one to two stops (depending upon how it's adjusted), so you don't want to leave on on your lens all the time. A C-Pol works by only allowing aligned light rays to pass through, reducing the "scattered" light rays of reflections. So it works best outdoors when 90 to 180 degrees from the sun. Pointing toward the sun, such as photographing a sunset, the filter will be of little use and is best removed because it actually can increase flare and chromatic aberrations. But selectively using a C-Pol can really help your images.
There are cheaper and there are more expensive, but I mostly use B+W MRC and Kaesemann C-Pols. I've also used Hoya HMC, S-HMC, HD and HD2, Heliopan SH-PMC and a few others. I haven't used, but hear good things about Marumi filters, too.
If you go shopping for a polarizer, you don't want a linear polarizer. Those will mess with your camera's autofocus (and in some cases will skew camera metering systems). You need to be sure what you get is a circular polarizer. That will work fine.
Two other types of filters that can be useful are Neutral Density (ND) and Graduated ND.
The ND fitlers are gray all over and are designed to reduce the light entering the camera. This is done in order to use a long exposure and/or a large aperture in brighter light situations, when you just can't adjust the camera's ISO, aperture and shutter enough to get the exposure you want. People use these for those scenic shots where water is blurred and creamy looking, for example. Or they might be used if you are shooting a portrait and want to strongly blur down the background. For still photography, a 6 to 10 stop ND filter is often in the range needed.
Graduated ND filters are half gray, half clear and are used as described in a previous response. For this type filter, I recommend getting the rectangular type, because you have to be able to adjust the filter up and down to match the horizon in your image. Usually, a 2-stop Grad ND is the most useful, but they come in 1 and 3-stop versions too. I have to say, though, that I have a set of these and haven't found need to use them for several years. I can do as good or even better job in post-processing software... either taking two (or more) shots at different exposures... or processing a raw file a couple different ways... then combining the "correct" part of each image in Photoshop.
Another type of filter that a lot of people use is a "protection" filter. Some use a UV or a Sky filters, others are Clear or simply "Protection". Personally I think it's rather silly to expect a thin piece of glass to provide very much protection to a lens IMO, a properly fitted lens hood does a better job protecting when shooting... and lens caps work really well when storing my lenses. But, do what you want. If a protection filter means you'll get out and shoot more without worrying about your lens, go for it.
Whatever filters you get, it's best if they are good quality glass and multi-coated. Those will have the least detrimental effect on your images and give you the purest effects. Don't cheap out on filters, so few are really needed these days.
***********
Alan Myers
San Jose, Calif., USA
"Walk softly and carry a big lens."
GEAR: 5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3), some other cameras, various lenses & accessories
FLICKR & EXPOSUREMANAGER
05-15-2015 07:17 PM
Thank you Amfoto1! Thanks for taking the time to explain everything! I go to Yellowstone next Friday for a week. Rain there the past 10 days....rain in forcast everyday in the next 10!
05-15-2015 11:56 PM - edited 05-15-2015 11:57 PM
@illininutt wrote:Thank you Amfoto1! Thanks for taking the time to explain everything! I go to Yellowstone next Friday for a week. Rain there the past 10 days....rain in forcast everyday in the next 10!
Better take some plastic bags, rubber bands and tape to keep your gear dry, too!
I have $3 plastic ponchos in all my camera bags, plus a couple extras in my car, too. Learned my lesson getting caught out in a downpour with my gear a few years ago.
***********
Alan Myers
San Jose, Calif., USA
"Walk softly and carry a big lens."
GEAR: 5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3), some other cameras, various lenses & accessories
FLICKR & EXPOSUREMANAGER
05-16-2015 09:18 AM
Or buy a post editor like Photoshop Elements or Lightroom 6. They don't care whether it is cloudy or sunshine! Rainy or drought.
With the advent of the DSLR and the "continuing improvement" progress in post editors, filters are becoming more and more obsolete. Not totally, yet, but nearly.
05-16-2015 01:48 PM
@ebiggs1 wrote:Or buy a post editor like Photoshop Elements or Lightroom 6. They don't care whether it is cloudy or sunshine! Rainy or drought.
With the advent of the DSLR and the "continuing improvement" progress in post editors, filters are becoming more and more obsolete. Not totally, yet, but nearly.
I think the filters that are most easily replaced by post processing software are the B+W conversion filters (that boost contrast based on colors). Diffusion filters are also easily replaced via software.
I've seen software that replaces star filters, but the software doesn't seem to do nearly as well as a real filter.
The filters that software cannot replace include the Polarizer ("Circular Polarizer" is always needed for Canon DSLRs) or any type of neutral-density filter. ND fitlers change the exposure conditions so that you can use a different exposure than would otherwise be possible without the filter. This would allow you to use a slower shutter speed or create a shallower depth of field. The Gradient ND's (GND) help with dynamic range (particularly with landscape photos) so that you don't end up with either blown highlights or clipped shadows.
The Grads might be replaced by using HDR and processing with something like Photomatix. Some types of shots are not good candidates for HDR (if too much is changing in a scene it creates a challenge for HDR because you need multiple shots at different exposure levels. Some of the better HDR software can deal with the "ghosting" problems created by movement from frame to frame. But a single shot using a grad filter eliminates the issue completely.)
05-16-2015 05:17 PM
"I've seen software that replaces star filters, but the software doesn't seem to do nearly as well as a real filter."
That is probably due to the lack of talent or proficiency of the PS user. I recently attended a PS class with Ben Wilmore. He will make a believer out of you. If you have the oppertunity to do so, I highly encourage you do it. I thought I knew PS. I knew nothing compared to Ben Wilmore.
The polarizer, you have a point, slightly. But I said they were not totally obsolete, just nearly. You have less of a point on the ND and certainly less on the ND gradients.
12/18/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS C300 Mark III - Version 1..0.9.1
EOS C500 Mark II - Version 1.1.3.1
12/05/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.2
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.