cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

EOS R5 - High pixilation in low light

lsvasan
Contributor

Hi, Shooting with my R5  in low light with ISO greater than 1600 gives me a very grainy picture.  I dont have this problem when I use my 5D Mark IV. Any suggestions on I can avoid getting a grainy shot using my R5.

10 REPLIES 10

Tronhard
VIP
VIP

Hi and welcome to the forum:
If this is happening across multiple cameras and types, then it would suggest your issue is technique.  To help us to assist you further, it would be very helpful to know the following:
What types of images  you shoot - sport, portrait etc.
What lenses you use
What modes you shoot in: M, Av etc.
Any custom settings
What metering methods you employ: e.g. evaluative, single point, spot etc.
What you produce - images for social media digital display, prints (greyscale or colour?)

Finally, some sample images - preferably without processing  and with the EXIF data as well.  Please provide a link rather than post images, as we need to see the original images, not downsized ones to fit the site size limits for posting.


cheers, TREVOR

The mark of good photographer is less what they hold in their hand, it's more what they hold in their head;
"All the variety, all the charm, all the beauty of life is made up of light and shadow", Leo Tolstoy;
"Skill in photography is acquired by practice and not by purchase" Percy W. Harris

I was shooting at an indoor event. Used a RF24-105 - F4   L series lens in Manual mode. No custom setting, used evaluative metering. Attached is a picture. appreciate your inputs.

Here is a link to two images:

https://www.amazon.com/photos/shared/bv7sdtbtSRiprFNUleYZuw.cVBrRvytHDVqYGNaAI_25-

 

So of course this is somewhat subjective; "very grainy" to you might be "OK" to someone else.  If you want a baseline for comparison, I actually shot a test of the R5 by the light of one candle.  Skip to 03:35 to see what it's like at ISO 25,600 -- to my eyes, it's not too bad.  The test has no post noise reduction applied; it's straight from the camera, apart from de-logging.  You'll see the settings I used.

https://moonblink.info/MudLake/gear#Candlelight

I was shooting at an indoor event. Used a RF24-105 - F4   L series lens in Manual mode. No custom setting, used evaluative metering. Attached is a picture. appreciate your inputs.

Here is a link to two images:

https://www.amazon.com/photos/shared/bv7sdtbtSRiprFNUleYZuw.cVBrRvytHDVqYGNaAI_25-

My first reaction is that these are both under exposed, which would cause noise to appear in your images. I am curious why you are shooting in manual mode...

Can you try a few shots in Av mode and see what they turn out like please?


cheers, TREVOR

The mark of good photographer is less what they hold in their hand, it's more what they hold in their head;
"All the variety, all the charm, all the beauty of life is made up of light and shadow", Leo Tolstoy;
"Skill in photography is acquired by practice and not by purchase" Percy W. Harris

sure, will do

shadowsports
Legend
Legend

Hi Isvasan,

Like atticuslake I've had very good results indoors, in low light with higher ISO's.  His candlelight video would test the ability of any sensor's low light capability.  Here are 2 examples of ISO 2500 and 12800.  Please provide some example images as requested by Tronhard with details about the shooting conditions (artificial lighting?, shooting mode, settings, etc) 

38mm, f3.2, 1/80, ISO 250038mm, f3.2, 1/80, ISO 250034mm, f3.2, 1/80, ISO 1280034mm, f3.2, 1/80, ISO 12800

~Rick
Bay Area - CA


~R5 C (1.0.9.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve Studio ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 8 ~CarePaks Are Worth It

I was shooting at an indoor event. Used a RF24-105 - F4   L series lens in Manual mode. No custom setting, used evaluative metering. Attached is a picture. appreciate your inputs.

Here is a link to two images:

https://www.amazon.com/photos/shared/bv7sdtbtSRiprFNUleYZuw.cVBrRvytHDVqYGNaAI_25-

johnrmoyer
Whiz
Whiz

I hope some of this might help.

It seems to me that the EOS R5 is very sensitive to temperature.  As the temperature increases, so does the noise (graininess). The biggest difference between the EOS R5 and your 5D Mark IV is the IBIS and the higher resolution. IBIS means that it is more difficult to cool the sensor chip. Higher resolution on the same size sensor means that each photo site on the sensor collects fewer photons with the same exposure so that the probability of unexpected luminance or color is higher. Higher temperatures will also increase noise in the 5D Mark IV.

I try to avoid using the big screen and use only the viewfinder to reduce power usage since power use turns into heat. In the power settings, I set the screen and viewfinder to turn off quickly.

Also, it seems to me that enabling any of auto lighting optimizer, highlight tone priority, peripheral illumination correction, or portrait lighting in the camera menus makes it more likely that there will be noise. I enable these later in the Canon DPP software if that is desirable.

In Canon DPP, one may see the noise reduction that the camera would have chosen. The camera will reduce the amount of digital lens optimizer as the noise increases.

One strategy for dealing with the noise would be to apply noise reduction, then downsample, then apply unsharp mask. For noise reduction, Canon DPP works for me and other software also does noise reduction. A median filter would work for noise reduction before downsampling. I expect that one would not need to downsample to the resolution of the 5D Mark IV to get noise similar to the 5D Mark IV at the same ISO. I might downsample a noisy image to 75% (I use graphicsmagick for this, but other software also has good algorithms). Unsharp mask should have a radius larger than any remaining noise to avoid sharpening the noise.

 

exiftool -CameraTemperature *.CR3

will report the sensor temperature.

 

Announcements