EOS 5D Mark III or Canon 6D

[Antonrides]

Hi

I'm planning on upgrading to a full frame from my T3i. Most of my photography is outdoor wildlife and landscapes. Usually involves hiking to get there. I was thinking the 6d cause of it's size but I'm reading alot about autofocus not so good. The 5D sounds good but it's biggest con is it's size that could be a problem when hiking.

Any thoughts or suggestion?

Thanks

[ebiggs1]

"Where APS-C tops out is about where FF begins."

This is nonsense.  

[chrisschrimsher · Accepted solution]

---

@cale_kat wrote:

Curious about the child photography,  what lens and aperature are combining with the 6D to bother you?

---

Mainly the 70-200mm F/2.8L USM IS II. Sometimes the 24-70mm F/2.8L USM II if working up close. I try not to go less than F/4 to get a workable DOF but sometimes have to go 2.8 since I do a lot with available light.  When I review the images, the focal point can be right on the eyes for successive images but one or more will be slightly out of focus. I've used LensAlign and the lenses seem to be accurately calibrated so I just wrote it off to the less sophisticated AF system not being 100% accurate in a "running and gunning" scenario.

[cale_kat · Accepted solution]

@ebiggs1, that's sage.

[cale_kat · Accepted solution]

@chrisschrimsher, I guess it comes down to priorities. I understand that you prefer natural light but it isn't as though child photography was invented with the addition of the 5D3. If you're a pro, I guess you have your own reasons for not getting the 5D3, if not I'd open the shades a bit. (Please accept this as intended, as a light ribbing and with best wishes for your success.)

[twagn · Accepted solution]

---

@cale_kat wrote:

Where APS-C tops out is about where FF begins

Where exactly is that? I'm sorry but that's a bit over my head

[chrisschrimsher · Accepted solution]

---

@cale_kat wrote:

@chrisschrimsher, I guess it comes down to priorities. I understand that you prefer natural light but it isn't as though child photography was invented with the addition of the 5D3. If you're a pro, I guess you have your own reasons for not getting the 5D3, if not I'd open the shades a bit. (Please accept this as intended, as a light ribbing and with best wishes for your success.)

---

No worries at all!  You hit the nail on the head - I'm not a pro, and therefore don't have a pro's budget or experience.  You're also right that photogs did children's photography with WAY less advanced gear than even the 6D or a 5D2, which I also looked at, so there's probably an aspect of trying to compensate for technique (or lack thereof) with gear if I'm being honest.  I guess I'd call my interest somewhere between a hobby and a secondary source of income right now.  My dad did photography on the side when I was a kid so I've always been interested, I just never had the patience for dealing with film.  I had a Digital Rebel for a long time, then upgraded my glass when my daughter was born, then upgraded to the 6D because I wanted to go full frame and start making at least a little money on the side.  Overall I'm still happy with the 6D, but I am slowly saving my "hobby" money and hope to pick up a good deal on a gently used 5D3 when the 5D4 comes out.  🙂

More than you asked for, but yes, I'm hearing you the right way.  And if you have any tips on how to perfect my focusing techniques on moving subjects, I'd welcome them also!

Thanks again,

Chris