I'm posting here hoping to find someone who can help me.
I recently got a 6D mark 2 to shoot my videos and it was all fine. Last night I was asked to take some photos during a meeting but I immediatly saw the lack of quality in all of them. I can't explain this absence of details even in the darkest enviroment or with the slowest shutter...
It’s okay that this has you stumped as well.
What is mystifying has been your unwillingness to demonstrate the issue. What is mystifying is that you have had a new camera sitting around that you have not used for nearly a year, refuse to use, and have not tried to sell it.
What this has really been all about are the links to your web site that you posted, promoting your photography business. That is what this has been about all along. You have fooled no one.
We should probably focus on helping folks with photography issues and not speculate on why people are here.
We tried and failed. Her initial claim was that she had the same problem as the OP. The OP did not understand DoF. She said DoF was not her issue. I advised her to contact Canon a year ago. She has been uncooperative and argumentative.
Posting those links goes against forum rules, anyway.
Yes, high workflow, social media requierements (instagram).
the photo is already 4 times higher than what instagrams requires. so no point making it larger.
I do raw L on weddings and more important shots like fashion, where i know there is a high chance for the photos to be printed larger or in better dpi.
I use lightroom.
And when i shoot nightclubs i use jpg m size, thats why jpegs are small size. its only about an 11megapixel photo
Sorry, but that statement is complete nonsense.
Your initial "club" photo that you posted has full 24MP jpeg resolution, not 11MP. Yet, it has only a 2.5MB file size. The image has been highly processed. It has not come "straight from the camera" as you have claimed. Your credibility is zero in my book.
Like I pointed out earlier, a straight out of the camer JPEG file is too large to post in the forums. It HAS to be heavily processed. That is fact, which is not open to debate.
I call balls and strikes as I see them.
again you, always trying to help the least, just please...stop commenting on this thread, you are not helping anyone. straight out of the camera
also check out the megapixel calculator if you think you are so smart, 4160 x 2178 gives a 11 mp image... jesus..you are starting to get on my nerves cuestioning everything.