10-06-2016 11:34 PM
I have a Canon Rebel T3 and was wondering if there was a 200-400 tamron lens that is compatible?
Thanks Steph
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-10-2016 06:48 PM
Thank You All for helping me with my Issue, I am very happy to get support from all of you.
pris796
Jacksonville, FL
10-07-2016 11:38 AM
@stephadkins wrote:I have a Canon Rebel T3 and was wondering if there was a 200-400 tamron lens that is compatible?
Thanks Steph
I think there was. I'd recommend against this lens for several reasons
1. It's no longer supported - pretty old lens
2. It wasn't known for great image quality. Also there's a lot of chromatic aberration (purple and green fringing).
You will be much better off with a more modern lens.
10-09-2016 12:29 PM
Let me know what kind of Lens you find because I have a T3 also.
Pris796
10-10-2016 10:03 AM
Do you mean the Tamron AF200-400mm F/5.6 LD IF ? If it is, it is a pretty nice lens. It is on par with the 150-500mm Sigma of which I have both. The Tamron is a way old design and may not work well with new Rebels as I haven't tried it on one so I can not say.
I don't know for sure but I will guess a good used one is around $150-$175 bucks. Any of the current offerings for any of the makers including Tamron will be better. However, get it right and it will do a nice job. Check that is works, first.
10-10-2016 10:16 AM
Thank you for getting back with me, the 150-500mm Sigma sounds good.
pris796
10-10-2016 10:33 AM
@pris796 wrote:Thank you for getting back with me, the 150-500mm Sigma sounds good.
pris796
That's a fairly heavy lens for a T3 body. Be sure to always support the lens, and don't let the weight of the lens hang from the camera's lens mount. I used to use the tripod foot as a hand grip to support the lens/camera combination.
10-10-2016 10:49 AM
I really don't want a heavy lens, I am looking for something that can be hand held, I already have a 75-300.
pris796
10-10-2016 11:13 AM
"I really don't want a heavy lens, ..."
The 200-400mm and/or the 150-500mm are close relatives. In both size and weight. I don't know the exact figures but using both they are fairly similar.
"...something that can be hand held..."
That depends on you! I routinely hand hold the big Sigma S zoom and you measure it in pounds not ounces. I have no problem hand holding either the Tamron or Siggy mentioned.
"I already have a 75-300."
Any of these is better, IMHO, of course.
10-10-2016 11:15 AM
Start your own topic and explain exactly what you want. If you have and like the 75-300, what focal length are you looking for?
Except for the EF-S 55-250, any lens that has more than 200 mm of focal length will be big and heavy.
10-10-2016 11:21 AM
"That's a fairly heavy lens for a T3 body."
Yeah, I don't know why any body would say that. You don't hold a heavy lens by the camera anyway. I have had my big 600mm f4 prime on a XTi lots of times. So what? Putting it on a 1 series just makes the combo heavier!
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.1
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
07/01/2024: New firmware updates are available.
04/16/2024: New firmware updates are available.
RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF400mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF600mm F4 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF800mm F5.6 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
RF1200mm F8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.