11-11-2012 02:09 PM
11-11-2012 02:19 PM
In comparison to a full frame.... you'd get the same reach with 31mm.
11-11-2012 02:21 PM
11-11-2012 03:27 PM
What do you think about the prime 35mm f/2... Running on a cheaper budget? jajaja
11-14-2012 12:15 AM
28mm on a crop body is 45mm; 35mm on a crop body is 56mm. To get exactly 50mm, you can use a zoom lens at around 32mm. I can't really tell 50mm from 45mm but that's just me.
I use the 28mm f/1.8 on a crop and am happy with it. No experience with the 35mm f/2 but I'm guessing the difference will be similar to the 50mm f/1.8 and 50mm f/1.4.
I had the 50 f/1.8 and loved it. I sold it to get the f/1.4 thinking it would knock my socks off. I see the difference, but as a hobbyist, I would have been happy sticking to the nifty-fifty. Beginning to ramble....
11-11-2012 02:25 PM
11-11-2012 04:46 PM
Out of the Canon 35 f/2 or 28 f/1.8 I personally would spend the extra couple of hundred on the 28 f/18 for a crop body.
03/02/2023: New Firmware Updates Are Available:EOS R7 - Version 1.3.0EOS R10 - Version 1.3.0
2/07/2023: New product announcements!EOS R8 EOS R50RF-S55-210mm F5-7.1 IS STMRF24-50mm F4.5-6.3 IS STMRF15-30mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.