12-11-2018 09:34 AM
I plan to get into photography, starting with a "low end" DSLR recommend to me by a friend, the Nikon D3400. I also plan to purchase an all-round lens for portraits, landscapes, architecture, etc. I had just two questions. What's the different between these two lenses other then focal length, price, and design? And do you believe the ~$400 NZD increase for the 16-300mm is worth the cost?
12-11-2018 09:40 AM
What two lenses? And we generally deal with Canon products here. See the big "Canon" at the top of the page?
12-11-2018 10:39 AM
"I also plan to purchase an all-round lens for portraits, landscapes, architecture, etc."
I don't know what you are talking about either but I think you will be better off buying a P&S instead of a DSLR.
"...do you believe the ~$400 NZD increase for the 16-300mm is worth the cost?"
I have no idea what this is either but anything with a 16-300mm zoom range isn't worth ~$4 NZD let alone 400, whatever that is!
12-11-2018 04:54 PM
@ebiggs1 wrote:"I also plan to purchase an all-round lens for portraits, landscapes, architecture, etc."
I don't know what you are talking about either but I think you will be better off buying a P&S instead of a DSLR.
"...do you believe the ~$400 NZD increase for the 16-300mm is worth the cost?"
I have no idea what this is either but anything with a 16-300mm zoom range isn't worth ~$4 NZD let alone 400, whatever that is!
I believe NZD = "New Zealand Dollars".
But it's not just you, Ernie. The spell checker doesn't seem to like "Zealand"!
Actually, I wouldn't mind being in NZ just now. It's been ridiculously cold here lately.
12/05/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.2
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
07/01/2024: New firmware updates are available.
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.