data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ab70/5ab70bbc9a97873f12af0e1c7e4277e4fbf680e4" alt="erskine erskine"
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-19-2018 11:28 AM
Hello everyone. I am new to this forum and a reall rookie whenn it comes to photography.
I have a Canon EOS700D which I thinkmis called a Rebel T5i in other parts of the world. With the camera I use the follow lenses:
EFS - 18-55mm
EFS - 55-250mm
EF - 40mm
Recently I decided to have a go at some macro photography and thought I could do this with the existing lenses. But I find that I cannot get close enough with these lenses. Foolishly, I thought that the fact that they mentioned 'macro' on the lenses meant that they would be suitable for photographing small objects. I think I now understand that they can get close - but not close enough? I would be happy for anyone to correct or confirm this. 🙂
So, I had a look for a macro lens and found that the cost was just too expensive for me to afford.
I then read that it was possible to reverse the lenses and use them in conjunction with an 'reversing ring'. So, I bought 2 rings to fit my lenses. However, it seems that the lens that I have wll not focu manually when not fitted the correct way. Rresumably because the lens does not recognise that the camera is turned on when the contacts are not meeting? So it seems that reversing the lenses will not work unless I work within some limitations of focusing using the zoom to the point where the object comes in focus. Again, limiting the effectiveness of the lens. The 40mm lens does not work at all in this case.
Now I have heard that you can buy 'close up' lenses to attach to the fornt of the lens which will magnify the existing lens making photographing tiny objects possible. These can be reasonably priced - especially if lesser known ones are bought. But even Canon ones are more reasonably priced than a true macro lens.
So......... can anyone tell me if the 'close up' attachments are worth buying? Will they work with the lenses that I mention? Or am I wasting my time and money once more?
Apologies if this question has been asked before, but I was hoping to learn more by entering into a discussion about what I am trying to do. As I said, I am pretty much ignorant about photography but as I now find myself with more time on my hands, I would like to get involved more and learn what can do with my camera.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-22-2018 09:26 PM
I used to own the EF-S 60mm macro (and I bought a hood). When I went full-frame and sold off my last APS-C body, I gifted the lens to my nephew.
But for a while, I still had it and my EF 100mm f/2.8L IS USM (a really nice lens - I still have this lens) to compare. I was always amazed at how that EF-S 60mm could hold it’s own against the Canon “L” series macro. That 60mm is a favorite and one of the finest EF-S lenses in the lineup. I hope you really enjoy it!
5D III, 5D IV, 60Da
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ab70/5ab70bbc9a97873f12af0e1c7e4277e4fbf680e4" alt="erskine erskine"
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-23-2018 02:17 AM
@TCampbell wrote:I used to own the EF-S 60mm macro (and I bought a hood). When I went full-frame and sold off my last APS-C body, I gifted the lens to my nephew.
But for a while, I still had it and my EF 100mm f/2.8L IS USM (a really nice lens - I still have this lens) to compare. I was always amazed at how that EF-S 60mm could hold it’s own against the Canon “L” series macro. That 60mm is a favorite and one of the finest EF-S lenses in the lineup. I hope you really enjoy it!
Many thanks. It will certainly open up more options for me now and I am looking forward to learning how to get the best from it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ab70/5ab70bbc9a97873f12af0e1c7e4277e4fbf680e4" alt="erskine erskine"
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-23-2018 02:21 AM
@ebiggs1 wrote:"I did buy a used 60mm lens and it arrived today. "
You know you can use it for more than just a macro. It is a pretty good general use lens.
I thought that may be the case, but it is good to know. I currently have a 18-55mm lens that I tend to use as my general purpose one. But it will be interesting getting to 'know' this new lens.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-23-2018 01:52 PM
Tim said, "I used to own the EF-S 60mm macro (and I bought a hood)."
Tim is spot on. The hood is a great add-on. All your lenses should have a hood.
EOS 1D, EOS 1D MK IIn, EOS 1D MK III, EOS 1Ds MK III, EOS 1D MK IV and EOS 1DX and many lenses.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-10-2020 04:16 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-11-2020 01:20 AM
@Johnny-Angel wrote:
Hi guys, Here is my first post! I fancy treating myself to a Canon EF 100mm F/2.8L Macro IS USM lens. A friend gave me an EF 25 2 Extension Tube and I was wondering if anyone has used this combination? I do feel like selling the tube and putting the proceeds towards another L Lens but could I be sorry and should I keep the tube? Regards, Johnny
Without knowing the focal length of the lens you are using with the extension tube, it is not possible to answer your question.
"Enjoying photography since 1972."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6448a/6448a500fe55baa4f9110c8586e3e5a23606d771" alt=""
- « Previous
- Next »
- « Previous
- Next »