cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

EOS Rebel XS lens recommendations for sports photography

Tiffanieelliott
Apprentice

HI! I purchased a EOS Rebel XS years ago for my wedding business to take photos of decor but was never able to get good images and it just stayed in my closet. My kids have been asking me to take sports pictures of them so I got it out and want to buy a good lens. I have a daughter who plays softball ( pitcher) and volleyball and a son that plays football and wrestles. I need something that can capture indoors and outdoors. I am wanting something with great shutter speed for quick moving and clear images. Chat GPT told me the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L is the best option but I spoke to a lens company and they said its a big much for this camera and what I want to do. The recommended a Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L or a Canon 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD MACRO Lens for Canon.    I don't want to spend over a $1,000 an hoping to get a used. I did see I can get a 70-200 for right under 1,000 but it might be to powerful. I really just need something that can clearly take photos from a max of 50-70  feet or so. I don't anticipate using this for long distance images. I appreciate all the feedback. Thank you! 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

wq9nsc
Elite
Elite

Chat GPT is steering you wrong, not surprising since these are just large language models that scrape the web and have the ability of a not so bright pre-teen in discarding bad/false information.

The 70-200 f2.8 is the most frequently used sports lens in the world because of its versatility, fast focusing, and ability to work well in low light.  I have a lot of Canon lenses and I shoot sports using at least two camera bodies and lenses at every event; one of those bodies will have an EF 70-200 f2.8 and depending upon the event, 60 to 90 percent of the images captured will be with that body/lens combo.  It is a GREAT sports lens.

The only downside to the 70-200 f2.8 for you is for field sports like football, it may be a little short at times but with the Rebel and its APS-C size sensor 200 mm on it provides an equivalent field of view to 320 mm on a full frame camera.  For many years, I shot a lot of football and soccer with a Canon 300 f2.8 on one body and it did a great job (I do shoot from the sidelines so your distance from the field is a BIG consideration).

The 70-200 f2.8 is not "too powerful" (i.e. too long of a focal length) for most sports situations.   Unless you are only a couple of feet from the action, it will be fine in terms of field of view at the 70mm end.  And you definitely do NOT want the f4 or slower lenses with your Rebel XS when you get into low light situations because not only will it increase image noise, a narrower maximum aperture lens will also slow down the AF system.  Even with my Canon 1DX III bodies which do exceptionally well in low light, I switch from the excellent Canon EF 200-400 f4 to a 400mm f2.8 prime for most night events.  The EF 70-200 f2.8 is a versatile and highly capable sports workhorse whether you are shooting football, basketball, volleyball, soccer, or pretty much any sport indoors or out, day or night!  Images below were all captured with a Canon 1DX III and EF 70-200 f2.8, the highly reliable Canon gear made it easy to do 🙂

Rodger

A48I1125.jpgA48I4167.jpgA48I4185b.jpgA48I4912.jpgA48I5722.jpgA48I6657.jpgA48I7084.jpg

EOS 1DX M3, 1DX M2, 1DX, 5DS R, M6 Mark II, 1D M2, EOS 650 (film), many lenses, XF400 video

View solution in original post

11 REPLIES 11

kvbarkley
VIP
VIP

50 to 70 feet *is* a long distance!

The good thing about the 70 to 200 L is that it captures images in low light, and most gyms would be considered low light. It would be an excellent choice.

I appreciate your reply. Would I have issues using this lens if I am shooting closer up? Say 20 feet? 


@Tiffanieelliott wrote:

I appreciate your reply. Would I have issues using this lens if I am shooting closer up? Say 20 feet? 


The lens will focus at that distance, but the issue would be how large the subject is. What lens do you have now?

John Hoffman
Conway, NH

1D X Mark III, M200, Many lenses, Pixma PRO-100, Pixma TR8620a, Lr Classic

I have the assume the 18-55 (what came with it) 

kvbarkley
VIP
VIP

No, that is why you have a zoom. The image will just get bigger. If you have to, you can always switch to your other lens - I assume the 18-55 - for things that are close. That is the raison d'être for having an interchangeable lens!

do you think either of these lenses would work for what I am doing or do I just spend the money and splurge. This is just mom photography so I don't want to go to big but I will use it for at least 8 years- Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L or a Canon 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD MACRO Lens for Canon.

kvbarkley
VIP
VIP

I think you should splurge. 105 is a bit short, and f/6.3 is a bit slow.

wq9nsc
Elite
Elite

Chat GPT is steering you wrong, not surprising since these are just large language models that scrape the web and have the ability of a not so bright pre-teen in discarding bad/false information.

The 70-200 f2.8 is the most frequently used sports lens in the world because of its versatility, fast focusing, and ability to work well in low light.  I have a lot of Canon lenses and I shoot sports using at least two camera bodies and lenses at every event; one of those bodies will have an EF 70-200 f2.8 and depending upon the event, 60 to 90 percent of the images captured will be with that body/lens combo.  It is a GREAT sports lens.

The only downside to the 70-200 f2.8 for you is for field sports like football, it may be a little short at times but with the Rebel and its APS-C size sensor 200 mm on it provides an equivalent field of view to 320 mm on a full frame camera.  For many years, I shot a lot of football and soccer with a Canon 300 f2.8 on one body and it did a great job (I do shoot from the sidelines so your distance from the field is a BIG consideration).

The 70-200 f2.8 is not "too powerful" (i.e. too long of a focal length) for most sports situations.   Unless you are only a couple of feet from the action, it will be fine in terms of field of view at the 70mm end.  And you definitely do NOT want the f4 or slower lenses with your Rebel XS when you get into low light situations because not only will it increase image noise, a narrower maximum aperture lens will also slow down the AF system.  Even with my Canon 1DX III bodies which do exceptionally well in low light, I switch from the excellent Canon EF 200-400 f4 to a 400mm f2.8 prime for most night events.  The EF 70-200 f2.8 is a versatile and highly capable sports workhorse whether you are shooting football, basketball, volleyball, soccer, or pretty much any sport indoors or out, day or night!  Images below were all captured with a Canon 1DX III and EF 70-200 f2.8, the highly reliable Canon gear made it easy to do 🙂

Rodger

A48I1125.jpgA48I4167.jpgA48I4185b.jpgA48I4912.jpgA48I5722.jpgA48I6657.jpgA48I7084.jpg

EOS 1DX M3, 1DX M2, 1DX, 5DS R, M6 Mark II, 1D M2, EOS 650 (film), many lenses, XF400 video

@Tiffanieelliott I highly recommend that you take my collogue Rodger's advice. He is a sports photographer and he can recommend the best lens to you. You can get any version of the Canon EF 70-200mm F/2.8L IS USM lens lineup. It doesn't have to be the newest EF 70-200mm F/2.8L IS III USM. The version II can be found readily and I wouldn't recommend the non-IS version of the lens. I wouldn't recommend the EF 24-105mm F/4L IS USM lens lineup that is standard zoom lens designed for Full Frame cameras and it would be too short for sports photography.

-Demetrius
Bodies: EOS 5D Mark IV
Lenses: EF Trinity, EF 85mm F/1.8 USM
Retired Gear: EOS 40D, EF 50mm F/1.8 STM & EF 70-210mm F/4
Speedlites: 420EX, 470EX-AI, 550EX & 600EX II-RT

Announcements