05-26-2024 03:05 PM
Hello, I'm new on this forum.
I recently bought a used EF 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II USM from a store online thinking it would be the greatest lens I have ever owned from reading up on it a lot beforehand.
The lens looks like new and I intended to use it on a Canon R6 mk 1 with the original standard Canon adapter. But to my disappointment just around 30-40% (if I'm being nice to the lens) of the shots are in focus on the eye using Servo AF, face + eye-tracking, back button focus and using shutter speeds around 1000-2000th. I have tested this on my 5 year old daughter and my wife who have been walking, running and just doing normal things in the every day life and with this low amount of shots in focus in pretty disappointed.
I have tried all different cases for autofocus and to nap the eye tracking to different buttons. I do have two R6's and the results are the same on both bodies. The firmware is the latest on both bodies too.
I have a few other lenses like EF 100mm f/2, Tamron 24-70 f/2 G1, EF 100-400mm L mk 1, RF 24-240mm that I have done the same tests with. The 100mm f/2 gets more shots in focus by a great margin for example, about 75% in focus. I thought I had bought almost the best EF 70-200 f/2.7 lens out there, but shouldn't it perform better than this? Maybe I should have kept my old Sigma EX 70-200 f/2.8 without stabilization instead...
Sometimes it looks like the focus is on the eyelash, nose or mouth but sometimes the image is just soft. When shooting static objects or people been still it gets focus as I would expect it to. The problem is when tracking moving subjects. Could there be something wrong with the lens so it's unusual slow to track?
For example I had my wife walk mostly towards the camera from a distance looking both straight on and to the sides with her head and of 169 shots I got 52 in focus. When it gets focus it is fantastic, but shouldn't it get more shots in focus?
Is there still something I can try or change to get the results I know this lens can achieve or is it a case of trying to return the lens? I'm shooting my first wedding this summer and wanted to use this lens, but I don't want to feel unsecure if the lens will get the important shots in focus or not doing while under the pressure of the big day for the couple.
Thank you for your thought on this!
06-01-2024 01:57 PM
How many fps are you trying to take. Is the camera set to H+ shooting. If so this lens DOES NOT support it.
06-01-2024 02:07 PM
I believe it does support H+? It has the H+ icon in green on the screen. I have tried both H+ and the "regular" high speed.
Do you believe selecting the H+ has anything to do with the missed focus?
06-01-2024 02:21 PM
Yes that lens doesn't support it. I have an older lens the EF 85mm F/1.8 USM. The camera lets you select it but it doesn't shoot anywhere near 12 fps.
06-01-2024 02:52 PM
I have seen another official list where the lens is on the list and heard from other people that it is supported I have the green H+ symbol and I feel it definitely shoots faster than my 100mm f/2 for instance.
06-02-2024 11:31 AM
I checked with Canon Support while the EF 70-200mm F/2.8L IS II USM lens does support 12 fps. The R6 MK I (classic) and the EF 70-200mm F/2.8L IS II USM lens. When used together DO NOT SUPPORT 12 fps. The EOS R3 and EOS R6 Mark II for instance do. So I would discontinue using H+ shooting with that lens. Since that combo isn't supported and you're having a lot problems with missed focus.
06-02-2024 04:08 PM
Alright, thank you for clarifying that 🙂
06-01-2024 04:50 PM
Greetings,
I would trust the page Demetrius posted from the R6's manual. The lens is not listed. While the lens itself might be capable of H+. it might not be when used with the R6 mkI.
Could it have been missed, sure. You can check with Canon Support to be sure.
~Rick
Bay Area - CA
~R5 C (1.0.7.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 8 ~CarePaks Are Worth It
06-01-2024 04:54 PM
It might be so, but that is fine however it is for me. Any suggestions on my problems with the lens?
06-01-2024 06:52 PM
@Shebulba wrote:It might be so, but that is fine however it is for me. Any suggestions on my problems with the lens?
I gave my recommendations previously.
~Rick
Bay Area - CA
~R5 C (1.0.7.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 8 ~CarePaks Are Worth It
06-01-2024 05:26 PM
The screenshot is from the R5's manual. But I did double check the manual for the R6 classic. The exact same lenses are listed.
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.1
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
07/01/2024: New firmware updates are available.
04/16/2024: New firmware updates are available.
RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF400mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF600mm F4 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF800mm F5.6 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
RF1200mm F8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.