11-21-2024 01:50 AM
Just recently got my hands on my own rebel T7. I have been using school provided cameras (R6 with 70-200mm f2.8 on them) for other sports such as soccer and football, but im trying to learn how to do more with less. What would be a good lens preferably under 200 dollars for basketball/wrestling? I have heard the 85 mm f1.8 is decent but not quite sure.
11-21-2024 06:02 AM
What would be your shooting location for the each sport?
Your camera doesn’t have great low light performance. I would recommend a wide aperture prime lens like the EF 50mm f/1.8 STM.
11-21-2024 09:45 AM - edited 11-21-2024 09:50 AM
Personally I would say the the 70-200mm 2.8 would be my first choice but there is no way to fit that into a $200 budget. You will get recommendations that fit the budget but will not be optimal for the sport you are photographing. A 85mm or 50mm will work for wrestling if you are allowed up on the mat but even on the floor basketball would be difficult.
Having a good position on the floor and being able to move freely would critical to getting good frames. Both lenses would most likely require some heavy post production cropping. Depending on how you plan to use the images the 24 MP sensor will impact your image quality if you have to crop deeply.
Have you thought about saving for a 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II? You can find them used in decent condition for somewhere between $900 - $1300. A 50mm or 85mm would be great to have in your lens arsenal, probably just not the best suited for these sports.
R3 ~ R5 ~ R6 Mk II ~ R50
Lenses: RF Trinity and others
Adobe and Topaz Suite for post processing
Personal Gallery
11-21-2024 10:49 AM
I will be allowed courtside at both basketball and wreslting matches, and they both take place in highschool gyms which I understand have poor lighting most of the time. Would saving up for a 70-200 be worth it or would I then just be limited by my camera body?
11-21-2024 11:33 AM - edited 11-21-2024 11:40 AM
I can only give you my perspective and hopefully others will give you their thoughts on the topic.
I own DSLR and MILC bodies. I use Canon and Sigma EF lenses on both, on the mirror-less I use the Canon $129 adapter when using an EF lens. The EF lenses work outstanding on both, do the research and you will find that many, including professionals have moved to R bodies and maintained their EF glass and are very pleased with the results.
That was a lot of words before answering the question. Your T7 will absolutely work, is it the best, you know the answer but it is a good camera. The 70-200mm will definitely make your experience more gratifying, give you more flexibility on how you approach subjects on the floor, and should provide better images which really depends on your skill set.
If you decide you have the passion for photography you do like most of us did when starting out, you build your equipment as funds allow. I would use the T7, save and buy the 70-200mm used and start saving for your next piece of equipment.
Moving to mirror less, well the focus point, focus speed and available ISO features are a great reason to make the transition. Your 70-200mm will provide you with years of enjoyment on either body type. Two things to be aware of:
Again, that's a lot of words.....I'm sorry but I hope this helps.
R3 ~ R5 ~ R6 Mk II ~ R50
Lenses: RF Trinity and others
Adobe and Topaz Suite for post processing
Personal Gallery
11-21-2024 11:37 AM
Thank you for the response! As i said before I have been using the school provided equipment and I agree that a 70-200 mm is easily the best thing I have used to date, however im not allowed to use those for anything on my own time. I think I will begin saving for a 70-200. Do you have any exact recommendations for one that would work with my camera, and what reliable websites/sources should I try to find used lens on?
11-21-2024 11:48 AM - edited 11-21-2024 11:49 AM
You'll see that Rodger responded below. He does some fine work and used the 85mm with success. For sports he can assist you since he lives sports photography. I look at his posts to continue to learn all the time!. Big fan!
Now to answer your question, I would get the EF 70-200 f/2.8 IS II, it is a good lens and I'm not sure I could justify the added expense for the III.
For used equipment I use KEH or MPB. Both supply consumers with equipment that is as good or better hen described and they have a decent warranty period. Stay away from Ebay, Amazon or anyone that does not have a decent reputation in the industry. I simple google search will answer that question.
R3 ~ R5 ~ R6 Mk II ~ R50
Lenses: RF Trinity and others
Adobe and Topaz Suite for post processing
Personal Gallery
11-21-2024 11:49 AM
Thanks so much!
11-21-2024 04:48 PM
If you get the chance stop back by and let us know how things out and post some images. We're always interested in the results.
R3 ~ R5 ~ R6 Mk II ~ R50
Lenses: RF Trinity and others
Adobe and Topaz Suite for post processing
Personal Gallery
11-21-2024 03:07 PM
“ . Would saving up for a 70-200 be worth it or would I then just be limited by my camera body. “
I think the 70-200 is too long for shooting indoor sports using a crop sensor. You would also need something that provides a lot of light.
12/18/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS C300 Mark III - Version 1..0.9.1
EOS C500 Mark II - Version 1.1.3.1
12/05/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.2
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.