cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

The Canon XF200/XF205 is about the perfect camcorder ergonomically.

Abel1
Apprentice

In my opinion, the Canon XF200/205 is just about the perfect camcorder, ergonomically speaking. It improved upon the ergonomics of the XF100 by adding three lens control rings, a rotating grip, and a third start/stop record button on the front left of the camera. It's a shame these ergonomics did not carry over into later XF cameras, which seem to have gone in two directions: the XF400 retains the same small form factor of the XF100/200 (smaller, even, with its removable top handle), but reverted back to the single lens control ring of the XF100, while the XF705 seems to have spawned from the more professional grade XF305, with its larger body, three lens control rings (on L-Series glass!), and LCD screen located on the top handle; neither has left side record button or the rotating side handle featured on the XF200. I reached out to Canon a few years ago about my desire to see these features implemented in the next iteration of XF camera; lo and behold, the XF605 was released (basically just a shrunken down XF705 with better codecs), and while it is closer in size to the XF200, it still does not feature the rotating side handle or left side record button; if it did, I would have purchased it in a heartbeat! Please, Canon, if you ever put out an XF500 or XF805, I humbly request that it feature a rotating side grip, left side record button, and three lens control rings (L-Series glass would be nice too!). Thank you.

2 REPLIES 2

kvbarkley
VIP
VIP

You are only talking to users here. To have Canon here you post feedback. On the front page of the Canon USA website at the bottom in teeny tiny print you will find the feedback button

Feedback.jpg

billmakesmovies
Apprentice

Recently picked up the XF605 to use for run and fun stuff when I don’t think the FX6 should be pulled out for the job. Think the XF605 is pretty good! It has three major faults. No rotating side grip, the threads are recessed so you have to use step up rings, and the LCD doesn’t fold backwards against the side like on a traditional camcorder with the on body side screen. This makes filming a driver from the passenger seat of a car a bit of a pain. Of course one of my favorite cameras of all time was my XF100. That camera worked for me for many years! I missed out on the XF200/205, but can see how much it improved on the XF100. I do not like the XF400-XA70 camera where they made the top handle removable and moved the viewfinder to the body, basically fording the Low end XF lineup to the G/XA series. I’m with you, the XF605 could have been better. I would jump on an XF205 with the XF605 sensor in it, and have both! Right now thinking about grabbing an old XF100 or XF200 for those times I really don’t need a modern camera. Half the stuff I’m shooting is web delivery 1080, where my “big camera” is technically B cam to a bunch of GoPros. 

Avatar
Announcements