10-17-2024 11:05 PM - edited 10-17-2024 11:16 PM
The kind of photography I have done throughout my career has been documentary - be it wildlife, scenic, industrial, social or any other kind, I have never manipulated an image to show anything different from truth as I saw it at the time. I have often sought an artistic perspective or composition of a subject, but I have never substantially changed the content of the image.
Recently, I had to set that one aside... but for a good cause.
My next door neighbour from quite a few years and an on-going family friend has been a player in my world for about 20 years. She was often a help and haven to my family when someone was sick, or locked out of the house or just stressed because she had the steady, professional demeanor of a trauma nurse.
It was with huge shock and sadness that I discovered she had been diagnosed with aggressive terminal cancer. I wanted to make a portrait of her to have something for her family to cherish when she passed on. However, between one thing and another I had not been able to get a photo shoot going for several weeks.
My plan was to have her given a bit of a make-over - hair and cosmetic treatment to make her look her best, but when the family turned up none of that had happened: it took them over an hour just to get her out of the house to be able to travel to the venue they wanted. When they arrived, I was shattered by the devastation imposed on her by the cancer: her vacant eyes and remoteness. I was now faced with a haggard shell of the person I had known and respected.
Still, I took a series of images of them all, and with her alone. I presented them with the results as shot, but I was mindful of the expectation that, for many of those attending a service or celebration of her life, such a photo would be traumatic and distasteful and, above all, they didn't do her justice. One of the major revolutions of the photograph itself was the ability to see how a beloved ancestor once looked and I could not leave those images to posterity. So, I broke my rule.
I have always said I am a pretty basic Photoshop user, but now I was desperate, and I did a search in the help system for something that might help me to improve her image. I came across Photoshop's Neural filters and the de-aging algorithm, and I judiciously applied it to several images - the results were amazing to me.
While I appreciate the artistic application of such technology, I had not wanted to see it applied to manipulate the truth (although that horse has clearly bolted long ago). I didn't want to do any more than relieve some of the ravages of the disease - certainly not make her look like a spring chicken again.
So, here are the results (with permission):
I still struggle with this, but I hope it will be more comfortable to those left behind to look at the resultant images.
10-18-2024 01:02 PM
Trevor I can understand the conflict you went through here, but I am sure that all the people who will see the final image with the treatment will still recognise the person they want to remember. In my view that is what you have achieved and while it's a compromise of your own ethics it is in my view certainly appropriate here.
10-18-2024 01:52 PM
Brian, thank you so much for your feedback. I have fairly strong principles as to what or how I would photograph, and this was a situation completely out of my comfort zone. That support helps a lot.
Much appreciated.
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.1
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
07/01/2024: New firmware updates are available.
04/16/2024: New firmware updates are available.
RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF400mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF600mm F4 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF800mm F5.6 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
RF1200mm F8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.