cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Telephoto lens options for R5

mknabster
Enthusiast

After living with the R5 for nearly a year now, I'm finding that my older Tamron G1 lenses don't work too well with the R5. I just replaced my 24-70mm G1 with the Canon RF 24-70mm L and just wow, I'm glad I invested in it! But now my Tamron 70-300mm G1 is left, and it's posing the exact same issues as the other Tamron did, which was mostly related to the built in VC where the lens would shake a little bit when a picture is taken. My guess is that their VC doesn't communicate with the R5 when a picture is taken, but it is a pretty old set of lenses, I got many years of use from them with my 5D MKIII.

I would like to replace the Tamron 70-300 f/4-5.6 but I don't see any RF versions of the 70-300mm available. I know they have the 75-300 and the 100-400mm lenses, but I feel like the 70-300mm is the sweet spot for my uses. I like the extra reach it gives over a 70-200mm lens, though the variable aperture isn't as good as the f/4 or f/2.8 L versions of the 70-200mm currently available. As far as my use of it goes, the 70-300mm is purely for travel when I don't feel like lugging the RF 200-800mm with me. I can say that since getting the 200-800, I haven't picked up the 70-300 as often, unless I wanted to get a different perspective. Right now, I have the 24-70 and the 200-800; would it be a better choice to have a 70-200 and not have overlap? 

At this moment, I'm between the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS L and the RF 70-200mm f/4 IS L with a possible 1.4x teleconverter to get me that extra reach. 

11 REPLIES 11

shadowsports
Legend
Legend

Greetings ,

My colleagues appear to have your questions covered 🙂.  The RF 70-200 f4/f2.8 mkI's don't accept TC's.  You'll have to go Z series for that, but you will get the additional 120 mm of focal length with the 1.4x TC.  It's a lot of money though (Z + TC), 

The 24-240 has also proven itself, as you can see from Marc's beautiful photos.  Admittedly, (however) from the very first time I used my 100-500 I was hooked.  😍

Modest investment strategy.  Since you already have the 24-70 and 200-800, the RF 70-200 mkI would integrate with your existing gear well.  I have the f2.8 mkI and absolutely love it.  Biggest draw for me was the compactness of the mkI.  I never intended to use it with a TC though.  Look at your metadata. What focal lengths do you shoot at most commonly? Depends on you, what you want to carry and what you need to shoot.  

I honestly don't mind carrying 24-70 70-200 and 100-500.  If you find that you need that extra 120 mm more times than not then go with the Z series plus TC.  You may use the TC less than you think. 😉 Only you can answer that.

 

~Rick
Bay Area - CA


~R5 C (1.1.2.1), ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800, ~RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve Studio ~ImageClass MF644Cdw MF656Cdw ~Pixel 10 ~CarePaks Are Worth It

Thanks for your response Rick! Yes, I need to do some soul searching on this one. Getting a faster 70-200 was always on my dream list, I guess I really need to think if the extra 100mm is worth it for me to get something older. But you all gave me some good options to think about!

Friends and Family
Announcements