cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

RF 70-200 f2.8 Z w 2x teleconverter or EF 100-400 (mark 1)

ian-s
Apprentice

Hello! I am a long-time birdwatcher, new bird photographer, looking forward to some upcoming summer trips. My kit currently consists of a Canon R6 and the original EF 100-400 with an RF adapter. 

I’m planning on adding the new RF70-200 f2.8 Z lens to my kit before the summer and I’m wondering if I get the 2x teleconverter could I safely leave my old EF100-400 behind? The focal length and minimum aperture would be equivalent, and it seems like I shouldn’t lose focusing speed etc. since the new RF lens should be faster than the old EF lens. 

Thoughts? The weight savings would be huge if I could get away with it. 

3 REPLIES 3

JFG
Whiz
Whiz

Hi ian-s,

The RF native lens works better on an R6 than an EF lens for the following reasons:

Autofocus performance:  RF lenses have faster, more precise autofocus, especially with face and eye tracking.

Optical Quality: RF lenses are optimized for mirrorless cameras, offering better sharpness, contrast, and stabilization.

Size & Weight: RF lenses are more compact since they don't need space for a DSLR mirror.

However, using the RF70-200mm f2.8 L IS USM Z with a 2x converter slightly reduces sharpness and contrast, but RF lenses handle it well.  Autofocus speed; the 2x converter can slow down autofocus, especially in low light.  The RF lens is more compact than carrying a dedicated EF100-400 lens with an EF-RF adapter.

I hope this helps.  Let us know what you decide.

 

Cheers,
Joe
Ancora Imparo

"A good photograph is knowing where to stand."
--- Ansel Adams >
"You don’t take a photograph, you make it."
--- Ansel Adams

p4pictures
Elite
Elite

I'm in agreement with Joe, I think you should go with the RF 70-200mm f/2.8 Z and use the RF 2x extender. This combination will be be sharper than the original EF 100-400mm and will allow your EOS R6 camera to shoot at a faster frame rate since the old version of the EF 100-400mm automatically limits the continuous shooting speed as the lens cannot communicate fast enough with the camera. Additionally the AF performance of the RF lens and extender combination is much improved over the EF 100-400mm lens you have. 


Brian
EOS specialist trainer, photographer and author
-- Note: my spell checker is set for EN-GB, not EN-US --

shadowsports
Legend
Legend

Greetings ,

Additionally, the RF lens will serve you better in the long run as it will move forward with you seamlessly when you decide to get your next body.  

 

~Rick
Bay Area - CA


~R5 C (1.1.2.1), ~R50v (1.1.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve Studio ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 10 ~CarePaks Are Worth It

Announcements