cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Canon 100-500 vs 200-800 for bird photography.

aloma
Apprentice

Hi, I currently have a 100-500. I'm not getting the range I need. I tried a teleconverter and was unhappy with the results.

My big issue is the 200-800 doesn't have the "L" quality I'm used to. The worst thing the reviews said is it's bad in low light. I don't think that will be an issue in Florida.

I photograph large water birds. I've been having an issue where I can't get close enough and have to crop the hell out of it and photo quality takes a dive. It's not a common issue, but I'd get way more useable photographs if I had the extra 300mm.

I do not want to buy this and be disappointed with the picture quality. It's going to be paired with an r1.

4 REPLIES 4

jrhoffman75
Legend
Legend

rent one and see if it meets your needs. 

IMG_0146.png

John Hoffman
Conway, NH

R6 Mark III, M200 (converted to infrared), RF lenses, Pixma PRO-100, Pixma TR8620a, Lr Classic

jrhoffman75
Legend
Legend

https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/Share-Your-Photos/Shy-Male-Kingfisher-Taken-with-Canon-R3-and-Can...

John Hoffman
Conway, NH

R6 Mark III, M200 (converted to infrared), RF lenses, Pixma PRO-100, Pixma TR8620a, Lr Classic

March411
Authority
Authority

Renting one will take all the guess work out of your decision. I own the RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM and the RF200-800mm F6.3-9 IS USM, both lenses perform fantastic and the approximate 1.5 stops I lose on the RF200-800mm has rarely had impact. Knowing the limitations of the RF200-800mm I pack accordingly.

As for the quality, while the RF200-800mm isn't an L lens the IQ is very compatible to the RF100-500mm. We all know how the old saying goes, you get what you pay for.....

At half the price of the RF100-500mm there are some compromises that you will have to decide if you can live with if you pick one up. Personally, I'm a big fan of the RF200-800mm, it gives me quality images. Two things that bother me are having to manhandle the lens to get it to rack from 200-800mm, I normally twist the body/lens and the narrow FOV for birds in flight.

59635_Juvenile Elk.jpg     

 


Marc
Windy City

R5 Mk II ~ R6 Mk III ~ R7
Lenses: RF Trinity and others
Adobe and Topaz Suite for post processing

Personal Gallery

shadowsports
Legend
Legend

Both @JFG and @March411 have posted wildlife images captured with their RF 200-800's.  They are absolutely beautiful.  I've used mine to capture images of the moon.  IMO, it's a fantastic lens for the money.  Take John's advice and rent one for a week.  😉

Marc's photos

https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/media/gallerypage/user-id/230711/tab/all

Joe's photos

https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/media/gallerypage/user-id/218934/image-id/70754i3D7AC4C4C4129E8E/...

Rick's Moon Shot

https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/media/gallerypage/user-id/99879/image-id/60856iC2A8FFAAA40C82EE/t...

 

~Rick
Bay Area - CA


~R5 C (1.1.2.1), ~R50v (1.1.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve Studio ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 10 ~CarePaks Are Worth It

Announcements