cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Refurbished 80d...blurry out of focus photos.. HELP!

KevinG1
Enthusiast
Im new to photography, started this year with a rebel t6 that I outgrew fast. I seemed to learn pretty quick and have always shot in manual mode. Quality of my t6 photos are great! Clear, crisp, and so on.

decided to upgrade to a 80d, and picked one up through canon refurbished. Well the majority of my shots come out blurry. For example, i do car photography {stills} and lets say the wheels are out of focus, or the lights... cant seem to get consistent clear crisp photos.

Not sure if its me, or the camera. Seems all of my lenses will do it. Mostly shoot with the canon 50mm 1.4 and nothing comes out clear under f2.8. Best around 4.

Ive tried everything. Tripod, high shutter speed, manual focus.. live view, view finder, tried all different focus point methods. The one wierd thing I noticed is when i used live view today, it showed the image on the screen perfectly in focus and crisp. As soon as the shutter went of it became blurry. That was on a tripod, using 2 sec delay.

Hope someone can help me...
108 REPLIES 108

KevinG1
Enthusiast
Are you talking about me? Or napies when you said the camere waa bad? You said OP but idk if that was towards me


@KevinG1 wrote:
Are you talking about me? Or napies when you said the camere waa bad? You said OP but idk if that was towards me

Your camera is under warranty.  You should get it checked..  For all we know, the delivery box may have been dropped and bounced around a few times before it arrived at your house, and damaged the camera slightly.  It could simply be misaligned.

--------------------------------------------------------
"Enjoying photography since 1972."

KevinG1
Enthusiast
Im comparing this to my friend who's using a 6d with the same lens,50mm1.4, and he shots car photography at 1.4 with no issues at all.


@KevinG1 wrote:
Im comparing this to my friend who's using a 6d with the same lens,50mm1.4, and he shots car photography at 1.4 with no issues at all.

Bad lens.  Let him test your lens on his camera body, and vice versa.

--------------------------------------------------------
"Enjoying photography since 1972."

_MG_2247.JPG

_MG_2247.JPG

Some more samples i just took.  Both done in single point af, pointed at the front door handle, using back button focus and single shot.

 

blurry one

f1.4

iso 100

shutter 1/1600

 

clear one 

f5

iso 125

shutter 1/200

 

took 5 shots, f1.4, 2, 3.2, 4, and 5. F5 was the clearest. All others came out blurry. Progressively got better by closing the aperture.


@KevinG1 wrote:
Are you talking about me? Or napies when you said the camere waa bad? You said OP but idk if that was towards me

I think it has been pretty well established that your issue was a misunderstanding of the 45 point AF system, and that your 50mm f/1.4 needs AF microadjustment. 

 

Your AF microadjustment of your 50mm f/1.4 which you said had improved its performance that he said you should undo was what I was referring to, when I said telling you to undo something that worked was nonsense. 

 

I don't think there is anything wrong with your camera. 

 

I'm not certain if there is anything wrong with the other posters camera or not, but, eliminating other factors like we did with your camera is important before simply saying send it back.

 

It is next to impossible to judge how far an AF system is off using a 2D target.

 

In Canon's AF Microadjustment Guidebook they address this, and recommend a vertical target set up on grass, so you can see where the focus is actually falling. (front or back)

 

If a camera requires extreme AF Microadjustment (> +/- 15) with all lenses, yes it probably needs a trip into Canon as it is likely out of tolerance or certainly on the edge of it.

 

However if it requires smaller adjustment with most lenses, or some lenses require positive adjustment and others negative, then that indicates there really isn't an issue with the camera.

 

For the other poster, forgoing AF Microfocus adjustment and simply sending the camera back in my opinion is a waste of the user and Canon's time. 


@KevinG1 wrote:
Someone recommended the reikan focall software. I was going to give that a shot

I had poor luck with that software.

 

Just follow Canon's AF Microadjustment Guidebook

 

Prior to Canon releasing that guidebook I recommended using the 'DOT Tune' method, but, at this point I would use the methods described in Canon's guidebook. 

Thanks for posting the link. I was just unsure because he said to send it back because its bad. When i did my adjustment, +8 and +12 made it worse. +10 seemed to be perfect for me.

Announcements