03-27-2025
04:49 PM
- last edited on
03-28-2025
08:04 AM
by
Danny
Hello. I was just wondering why does this person's phot look so much more clear than the ones I take? Does his camera have a higher megapixle number? I also feel like I was in focus too. The moose is the one I found the other one is mine of the bird. I used the sigma 150-600 with my canon camera eos rebel t3. Maybe I just need an updade.
Tell me what y'all think?
03-27-2025 06:03 PM - edited 03-27-2025 06:03 PM
What was the ISO for this image? It was a bit noisy, exposure is a bit dark and how much of a crop?
I ran it through Topaz and removed the noise and bumped the exposure a bit.
R3 ~ R5 ~ R6 Mk II ~ R50
Lenses: RF Trinity and others
Adobe and Topaz Suite for post processing
Personal Gallery
03-27-2025 06:38 PM
It is dangerous to compare an SOOC (straight out of camera) image to a "found" image because the supposedly "better" image could be an altered Frankenstein image. A friend of mine who is a Canon enthusiast produces otherworldly images, but his "image" is 99% of the time a Frankenstein of several images stitched together and then worked over like a Hollywood celebrity and their plastic surgeon. While Topazed (sic), Photoshopped, Lightroomed (sic) images are a person's prerogative, I prefer SOOC and I actually like some noise/grain in black-and-white/monochrome images. Thus, if you had an SOOC image and a friend shot the same subject at the same time with a same/similar lens and there was a radical difference, that would at least be a fair discussion i.e. apples-to-apples. The bird image is a bit dark, but given the hefty telephoto lens camera shake would be another factor to explore as a cause for less than adequate sharpness.
03-27-2025 06:48 PM
Thank you very much! I will take all of this into consideration.
03-27-2025 06:51 PM
I'll have to check out Topaz. Thank you so much! ISO was 1600. Now I think I had that way too high, haha. It was sorta dark out and I needed some light, but I see all that noise it introduced into the photo now.
03-27-2025 07:28 PM
Lee made some valid points, a lot of images are significantly modified in post production. I like Topaz or DXO to reduce noise when I have limited options to reduce noise because of a lack of light. I don't want to give up on the image so I grab the frame and run it through noise reduction. But I will say that he is correct, straight out of the camera is always the goal.
Good luck, keep shooting because it will only get better as you move forward.
R3 ~ R5 ~ R6 Mk II ~ R50
Lenses: RF Trinity and others
Adobe and Topaz Suite for post processing
Personal Gallery
03-27-2025 07:32 PM - edited 03-27-2025 07:32 PM
Thank you! I am definitely going to get topaz!
03-27-2025 07:58 PM
First off, a moose is a lot bigger target than a Robin, it may have been a bit easier, but again maybe not. We would need to see all of you shooting data to really analyze the photo. At a quick glance, it looks like there could be a little movement in your image. That could be due to too slow of a shutter speed, or just technique. Knowing the focal length, shutter speed, aperture and ISO of the shot can really be helpful. Good post processing and noise reduction can make a picture better, but if you start with a better picture to begin with, it will be even better.
03-27-2025 07:58 PM
Do you know any discounts for Topaz?
03-27-2025 08:08 PM
Thank You!
03/18/2025: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.3
02/20/2025: New firmware updates are available.
RF70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Z - Version 1.0.6
RF24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z - Version 1.0.9
RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.8
RF50mm F1.4 L VCM - Version 1.0.2
RF24mm F1.4 L VCM - Version 1.0.3
01/27/2025: New firmware updates are available.
12/18/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS C300 Mark III - Version 1..0.9.1
EOS C500 Mark II - Version 1.1.3.1
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.