R7 Focus Stacking forces electronic shutter

[rpoole]

The R7, and other R series cameras, forces electronic shutter for focus stacking. This prevents the use of flash for focus stacking. There is no really good reason for not allowing mechanical shutter for focus stacking and the choice of which shutter should be left up to the photographer, not the camera. Does anyone know of any workarounds that can allow the use of flash with the built-in focus stacking?

[flashfast]

Perhaps they will implement this into the new R5 Mark II which should be unveiled next month, if the rumours are to be true.  Hopefully after that some new firmware updates will bring the functionality to other bodies such as R7 and R6 mark ii.  

[pwiles1968]

That’s one example using Olympus gear feel free to suggest others 

[pwiles1968]

The thread is about the lack of Bracketing with Flash not the stacking that is easy to resolve 👍

[pwiles1968]

Flash Recharge is fine I use my R7 with flash in manual mode around 1/125 I can get 8-10 shots in burst with flash (that is without a power pack) I have to manually move my camera to get a stack which is hit and miss, all I want is it to move the focus for me 

[TattooTroy]

Not activating the flash in focus bracketing has nothing to do with sensor read-out speed. This is more like Canon crippling the other cameras to cause frustration to its Macro photography customers. Only the R3 can do it. The R3 has an extra option,  " FLASH " button in the focus bracketing settings. When the flash option is set to "0 sec", the flash will rapidly fire to match each highspeed shot. When set to "1 sec"  the flash fires every second. I test it with the new EL-5 Speedlite and an R3 at Wex photos in the UK. 

Olympus OM camera is the way to go for macro photography. Many macro photographers are selling their Canon gears and buying Olympus cameras for macro photography. Olympus is cheaper, lighter, and smaller, plus much better macro results. I shall leave Canon in the past.

Here is a list of Olympus cameras that fire the flash in focus bracketing.

focus bracketing Olympus

[Waddizzle]

Adapt.  Use a video light.  It will capture the entire sequence in less than a second in most scenarios.  BFFFT, and you’re done.  You just might be able to capture more shots on a single charge of the video light compared to the flash.

[TattooTroy]

No video light out there is portable and will give great macro results as a flash paired with a professional macro diffuser like the Cygnustech macro flash diffuser. Focus bracketing with flash and a diffuser is the best method for capturing high-def macro shots in the macro world. 

Check out the results from the Olympus OM camera with flash focus bracketing.

Olympus OM camera with flash focus bracketing.

[DWS1]

The best macro shots are definitely taken using focus bracketing with flash. By Olympus OM system users. Canon has no rival. And No answer. When will Canon address this omission and provide it? They will lose many more macro photographers to Olympus if they don’t. Are you listening Canon? Give us some positive news if you want to keep us brand loyal!

[flashfast]

I wasn’t referring to the Olympus. Olympus cameras do focus stacking automatically.  What I meant was manually focus stacking was the old way.  It’s slow and cumbersome. Let’s say I have to shoot 100 products a day. Do you know how long it would take to get every product “properly” focused stack?  Wayyy too long and in my photography business time is money.  So as much as I love the R’s I can’t get one because it’s missing that feature and I’m not going to spend the extra money for an R3 just to get that feature because for that price I might as well get a GFX 100s ii. 

[Chunk]

This video shows you *DO NOT* need in camera bracketing. He uses manual lenses and the lean method to make his stacks. You can do this with any camera...and, objectively, get better IQ and more resolution with a number of cameras, including the R7, that simply is not possible with m4/3 format cameras. Its good to understand that all m/43 cameras are, are little sensors giving an equivalent fov to cropping larger format images made with apsc, full frame or medium formats. They dont provide "more reach". 

Lastly, "professional diffusers" is not cygnustech or any of the overpriced pieces of plastic new macro shooters are buying. You can, and many of us have for years, make diffusers that do just as good of a job for $5. Cygnustech and AK literally took the concave diffuser design principles many of us were using 10 - 15 years ago. Here is a link from years ago with people showing their DIY solutions. I have also shared one of my photos made with like $3 worth of material for the diffuser. 

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3953465