Greetings,
As great as the 5D4 is (and it is a wonderful camera), the R62 has eclipsed it in all but one category, that is megapixels. The R62 wins overall because it uses a different type of pixel density. It has a newer Digic X processor and has better low light capability than its Digic 6+ counterpart. In most but not all imaging situations, images captured with the R62 are of higher quality, clearer, with greater dynamic range than the higher resolution 5D4.
Video wise, the R62 doesn't have a recording limit, but more importantly its 4k is derived from 6k oversampling, it supports greater bit depth (10 vs 8), and doesn't have any crop. Even if it did, I would be less concerned about crop in this case, considering the other benefits mentioned above. If that's not enough, then buy a Ninja V+ and record 6k 60 in ProRes, but the 10bit C-Log3 should be enough for most people. Simply put the R62 is more powerful and capable of higher image quality than the 5D4.
Now take into consideration its newer software. It uses many of the same technologies taken from the R3. I am not an authority as I do not own either body, but I would buy the R62 if I had to choose between the 2. Worth mentioning, I'm sure significant work also went into the post production of the sample video you referenced.
I am interested to hear what Ricky or others think as well.
~Rick
Bay Area - CA
~R5 C (1.0.7.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, ~RF 200-800 +RF 1.4x TC, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 8 ~CarePaks Are Worth It
