01-05-2021 01:44 PM
Sigma released a statement a while ago stating that "AF can be used within the area of approximately 80% of the height and 80% of the width of the sensor surface" on the R5 and R6. I'm interested in getting the Sigma 70-200 Sport because I'm not interested in RF glass price or buying a used 70-200 L II. What's the reason for this AF area restriction? Is it because of distortion? Has this been a noticeable problem for tracking?
01-05-2021 02:16 PM
If that is a statement from Sigma about a Sigma lens, don't you think that it would be best to ask Sigma? I think so.
01-05-2021 04:37 PM
I don't know that there has been a definitive answer. Even some Canon lenses have restrictions, it might be due to falloff.
01-05-2021 05:29 PM - edited 01-06-2021 10:47 AM
@kvbarkley wrote:I don't know that there has been a definitive answer. Even some Canon lenses have restrictions, it might be due to falloff.
If I had to venture a guess, it would be because of vignetting when [the] lens is wide open for focusing.
01-06-2021 10:41 AM - edited 01-06-2021 08:54 PM
If anyone is interested, here is the announcement he is referring to:
I follow these types of announcements closely, and they are ultimately what influenced my decision to go with Sigma over Tamron after buying my 6D2 in 2017.
I'm first to agree that using Canon with Canon is preferred, but when you don't, going with a manufacturer who continues to actively address functionality and compatibility between its products and new body's as they are released makes a huge difference in over all user experience and satisfaction. It also allows your investment to retain its value over the course of its life.
Sigma's track record for addressing any compatibility issues with newer body's is very high.
~Rick
Bay Area - CA
~R5 C (1.0.7.1) ~RF Trinity, ~RF 100 Macro, ~RF 100~400, ~RF 100~500, +RF 1.4x TC, +Canon Control Ring, BG-R10, 430EX III-RT ~DxO PhotoLab Elite ~DaVinci Resolve ~Windows11 Pro ~ImageClass MF644Cdw/MF656Cdw ~Pixel 8
~CarePaks Are Worth It
01-06-2021 10:19 AM
"...the area of approximately 80% of the height and 80% of the width of the sensor surface..."
Who focuses in the outer 20% of a frame anyway? I doubt you have ever done that.
01-06-2021 10:27 AM
@ebiggs1 wrote:"...the area of approximately 80% of the height and 80% of the width of the sensor surface..."
Who focuses in the outer 20% of a frame anyway? I doubt you have ever done that.
Unlike DSLRs mirrorless bodies can focus all the way to edge of the frame just about. They have thousands of AF points. The EOS R has more than 5000 AF points.
01-06-2021 10:45 AM
"Unlike DSLRs mirrorless bodies can focus all the way to edge of the frame just about."
Not disputing that. But who uses or does that? I don't think I have ever, no I have never, needed the outer 20% of the frame to get critical focus. But then again I never use the outer focus points of my 1DX.
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.1
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
07/01/2024: New firmware updates are available.
04/16/2024: New firmware updates are available.
RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF400mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF600mm F4 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF800mm F5.6 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
RF1200mm F8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.