05-28-2019 02:13 PM
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-04-2019 06:23 PM
@ebiggs1 wrote:"The RAW file metadata is supposed to describe the RAW file, not some edits that someone made."
WE AGREE! It is simply a matter of how each editor handles it but there is one.
Frankly, Gentlemen, if I've inadvertently done something to help bridge the gap between you, my day has not been wasted!
Well, actually, it has. I'm supposed to be spending my time cleaning out our old house so that we can complete our move to Philadelphia. But that's another story.
06-05-2019 11:17 AM
'Adobe is always behind the curve; they have to wait for Canon to tell them what's included in the latest RAW file format."
Canon does not document how their Raw files work. Others will always be "behind the curve" because they have to analyse how they work.
"DPP's RAW files have always reliably included all the edits I've made... I have no reason to suppose that I've been getting some special treatment."
Sorry ya lost me on that one. I suspect DPP4 works exactly for you as it does for everybody.
"... if I've inadvertently done something to help bridge the gap between you, my day has not been wasted!"
I don't mind being shown where I go wrong. It happens and it will happen again, I'm sure. However, I don't like rude so I bow out then.
05-29-2019 09:55 AM
Does the same issue occur on more than one memory card? Have the memory cards been formatted in the camera? Does the EXIF info for the affected images in fact show them being saved in the Adobe color space, or do you see any other strange changes in the EXIF data between the different file naming structures?
05-29-2019 10:41 AM
Thank you for your reply!!!
Yes - it has happened with 2 separate CF cards - the most recent with a 128GB card.
Yes - the cards were formatted in the camera.
IF by EXIF you mean Details under Properties, under those .jpgs correctly listed with an initial underscore, the Image Color Representations states "Uncalibrated" .................whereas the images that start with an initial 8 in the file name, the Image Color Representations state sRGB.
05-31-2019 07:56 AM
@Zbadger wrote:Thank you for your reply!!!
Yes - it has happened with 2 separate CF cards - the most recent with a 128GB card.
Yes - the cards were formatted in the camera.
IF by EXIF you mean Details under Properties, under those .jpgs correctly listed with an initial underscore, the Image Color Representations states "Uncalibrated" .................whereas the images that start with an initial 8 in the file name, the Image Color Representations state sRGB.
If one of your Custom settings (C1, C2, C3) has sRGB colorspace saved in it this would explain it.
Also as metioned by Waddizzle any factory preset modes like HDR are likely to use the default sRGB colorspace.
05-31-2019 08:25 AM
My HDR images are Adobe RGB images, but I just checked my first C1 setting and sure enough, a photo I took had an sRGB image taken. However, I have not been using C1 when these occasional images with an 8 prefix have showed up.
05-31-2019 07:52 PM
@Zbadger wrote:My HDR images are Adobe RGB images, but I just checked my first C1 setting and sure enough, a photo I took had an sRGB image taken. However, I have not been using C1 when these occasional images with an 8 prefix have showed up.
I am pretty sure that the 5D4 saves HDR images as JPEGs.
I have never heard of an “Adobe RGB image” JPEG file before.
05-31-2019 11:33 PM
@Waddizzle wrote:
@Zbadger wrote:My HDR images are Adobe RGB images, but I just checked my first C1 setting and sure enough, a photo I took had an sRGB image taken. However, I have not been using C1 when these occasional images with an 8 prefix have showed up.
I am pretty sure that the 5D4 saves HDR images as JPEGs.
I have never heard of an “Adobe RGB image” JPEG file before.
Any JPEG has a color gamut associated with it; and on (I believe) any reasonably high-end Canon camera, that can be either sRGB or Adobe RGB. And any decent photo editor can produce either one in a RAW-to-JPEG conversion. Some (most?) commercial-grade printers must be able to read the gamut setting from the Exif data, because if I ask my favorite print shop which they prefer, they always tell me it doesn't matter.
Or am I misunderstanding the point you're trying to make?
06-01-2019 07:29 AM
@RobertTheFat wrote:
@Waddizzle wrote:
@Zbadger wrote:My HDR images are Adobe RGB images, but I just checked my first C1 setting and sure enough, a photo I took had an sRGB image taken. However, I have not been using C1 when these occasional images with an 8 prefix have showed up.
I am pretty sure that the 5D4 saves HDR images as JPEGs.
[ deleted ]
I have never heard of an “Adobe RGB image” JPEG file before.
Any JPEG has a color gamut associated with it; and on (I believe) any reasonably high-end Canon camera, that can be either sRGB or Adobe RGB. And any decent photo editor can produce either one in a RAW-to-JPEG conversion. Some (most?) commercial-grade printers must be able to read the gamut setting from the Exif data, because if I ask my favorite print shop which they prefer, they always tell me it doesn't matter.
Or am I misunderstanding the point you're trying to make?
Maybe I misunderstood what was being said. I thought he was saying the HDR images are saved as RAW files.
06-01-2019 11:08 AM
I think you need to go through the entire thread. There is a switch in the name convention in some of my pictures from _ to 8 as the prefix. The .jpg ones with the _ (which are the vast majority) ahow "Uncalibrated" when looking at Properties and then at "Color Representation". However , the ones that are labelled "8" show "sRGB". Thus, I am getting photos upon download not in chronological order - a bunch of intermittent "8's" at the end of each folder.
Canon suggest there might be something wrong with the camera???
But another contributor TT Martin wrote:
"If one of your Custom settings (C1, C2, C3) has sRGB colorspace saved in it this would explain it."
I responded " ...... I just checked my first C1 setting and sure enough, a photo I took had an sRGB image taken. However, I have not been using C1 when these occasional images with an 8 prefix have showed up."
06-01-2019 11:33 AM
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.1
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
07/01/2024: New firmware updates are available.
04/16/2024: New firmware updates are available.
RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF400mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF600mm F4 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF800mm F5.6 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
RF1200mm F8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.