01-15-2014 07:24 AM
Pictures taken with my 1D Mark IV show a blue horizontal line at the bottom from ISO 400 onwards. So far nobody has been able tot tell me the cause of this problem. The body is still quite new (15000 pics taken).
02-04-2014 10:35 AM
02-05-2014 11:59 AM - edited 02-05-2014 12:16 PM
Here is what the end of the blue line looks like on the RAW image. (it's a grey chequerboard as colour in a bayer matrix image is implicit by pixel location.. and this hasn't yet been 'interpreted')
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ahzuir3tuwis94d/blue_line.bmp
What we can see is the end of the line, and some 'slices' of both the dark and light lines, and a normal slice.. all slices are of the end of the lines, so the little graphs show a 'normal' segment on their leftmost edge, they are showing intensity vs position across the vertical branch in the image.
What these are telling us is that two rows are affected, one is overly dark and one overly light. this looks like a failure at one pixel location (the end of the line) damaging the entire row. You should be able to see in the middle and bottom graphs that there is still real signal in both the dark and the light rows, so the right software and some reference flat-light and dark images might well correct for it... alternatively the entire row can be scrapped and replaced with an average of the row above and below.
It's also safe to say your sensor isn't going to get better, but neither is it about to completly die on you.. my astro camera which is much more delicate as it's CCD has a couple of slightly 'hot' columns and I can process them out entirely.
I hope this is of some use. (I tried processing out the column in IRIS but haven't found a sufficiently good way as yet.)
Derek
edit: this of any use?.. (need a MAC) http://people.csail.mit.edu/ericchan/tmp/FixBadPixels.pdf
02-05-2014 03:23 PM
Your answer certainly is of some use. Thanks for all your trouble and time you put into it. Next step will be to find the right software. I'll begin with pixelfixer.
01-15-2014 10:17 AM - edited 02-01-2014 09:08 AM
Try a different CF or SD card. Card may have gone south on you.
01-15-2014 11:41 AM
I agree that it looks like a column of photosites is not working. But... I'm curious as to why this would only happen at ISO 400 or above.
The sensor is covered with photosites -- they are monochrome. On top of the photosites is the "bayer mask". The mask is a checkboard pattern of red, green, and blue "lenses" which makes the photosite beneath only sensitive to that particular color. They are group in clusters of 4 photosites in a 2x2 matrix. Two of the four squares (in opposing corners) are green. One corner is red. One corner is blue. If you were to lose a column which happens to be along the red/green column (as opposed to the green/blue) then you'd lose red sensitive and half the green sensitivity in that column. The result would be that this column is flanked by two "working" columns which are full of green/blue photosites... hence the teal blue look.
I do not know if this will work for you, but oddly... you can actually sometimes "clear" stuck pixels (but usually this is an indvidiual stuck pixel... not a whole column of them) by putting the camera into manual sensor cleaning mode (and you may have to do this 2 or three times). While the normal point of the self-cleaning mode is to flip up the reflex mirror and open the shutter so that you can inspect and clean the sensor (really the front-most filter because you can't actually touch the real sensor), it also neutralizes the charge on the sensor (or so I've read). This charging and discharging of the sensor a few times can often get "stuck" pixels to start working again. BUT AGAIN... I've only ever seen this used on individual stuck pixels... never a whole row.
01-15-2014 01:11 PM
I really want to know if we have additional false signal, missing signal, or cross contaminated signal between two rows.
The ISO 400 and above could come from different bias for high ISO.. The ratio of well depth to readout noise on these sensors is sufficiently high that I would not be at all suprised to see additional in pixel gain added as an option, either by additional circuitry or by adjusting bias to improve gain.
If the damage is rock solid, it is possible that the OP could process around it.. but it would be a pain to have to do that, I don't know if the long shot dark subtraction algorithum would help. The 5D has the High ISO multi-shot noise reduction algoritum.. if the 1DIV has that too it could help so long as the damage is just adding an offset to the affected pixels.
The idea of a highly charged spek of dust contaminating things is possible and worth doing sensor cleaning for, I'll remember that one.
01-15-2014 01:36 PM
02-01-2014 01:44 PM
12/18/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS C300 Mark III - Version 1..0.9.1
EOS C500 Mark II - Version 1.1.3.1
12/05/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.2
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.