05-22-2013 10:06 PM
I use Leica lenses on a canon body with an adapter. Is the image quality with the Canon 5Dmark 2 vs.the 5Dmark3 similar? Any reason to get one vs. the other? I like the idea, that I can change the viewfinder screens on the Mk 2. Any overwhelming improvement of the 5Dmark 3 that would warrant consideration? Thanks to those who have used both camera bodies.
Solved! Go to Solution.
05-22-2013 11:15 PM
The primary advantage of a Mk3 over the Mk2 is the AF. More points and it can focus with f/8. If your Leica lens is manual focus then you wouldn't care about it. The 5D3 has a little of an advantage in the ISO but not a huge factor. Other than that I'd say IQ is the same.
05-22-2013 11:15 PM
The primary advantage of a Mk3 over the Mk2 is the AF. More points and it can focus with f/8. If your Leica lens is manual focus then you wouldn't care about it. The 5D3 has a little of an advantage in the ISO but not a huge factor. Other than that I'd say IQ is the same.
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.1
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
07/01/2024: New firmware updates are available.
04/16/2024: New firmware updates are available.
RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF400mm F2.8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF600mm F4 L IS USM - Version 1.0.6
RF800mm F5.6 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
RF1200mm F8 L IS USM - Version 1.0.4
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.