11-09-2014 07:31 AM
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-09-2014 10:54 AM
See: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos600d/12
Their testing seems to indicate that it's about 5 stops below and 3&1/3rd stops to 4&1/3rd stops above (depending on if highlight tone priority was swtiched on.)
I think those were JPEG tests (I didn't see any indication of RAW and they usually go out of their way to let you know when they're doing RAW.) There is substantially more bit depth in RAW so it's likely to do a bit better if you shoot RAW.
If you're shooitng anything where you are worried about dynamic range then you should probably be shooting RAW anyway.
07-25-2016 11:53 AM
@kvbarkley wrote:Maybe so, but I bet this poster would have still piled on in the wrong topic!
But it would be the wrong topic in a board that many of us probably wouldn't read.
07-25-2016 11:56 AM
Not that it matters, but I guess it was not clear. I am assuming that the drive by poster would have posted in the exact same place, he just went for any ol' post that mentioned dymanic range, whithout regard to relevance. In fact, I suspect that this post actually belongs down in the EOS Cinema topic, where it is relevant.
11-09-2014 10:29 PM
12/18/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS C300 Mark III - Version 1..0.9.1
EOS C500 Mark II - Version 1.1.3.1
12/05/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R5 Mark II - Version 1.0.2
09/26/2024: New firmware updates are available.
EOS R6 Mark II - Version 1.5.0
Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited.